Trains.com

Another call to separate infrastructure from operations.

1069 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Another call to separate infrastructure from operations.
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:05 PM

http://www.railwayage.com/index.php/passenger/intercity/amtrak-we-must-do-something-transformational-now.html

(also, note that commuter operators on the NEC only pay avoidable cost)

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:39 PM
Excerpt from AIRNet-21 pdf

Retains US Government ownership of all Amtrak assets

Keeps Amtrak as the single national passenger carrier

Transfers $1.0 billion to Amtrak in addition to any appropriation

Spends 300% more annually than Amtrak on NEC and Midwest infrastructures

Enables over $17 billion in new projects in the first 15 years

Permits Amtrak to match passenger revenues with train costs without NEC allocations

Allows Amtrak to run entire National System for under $600 million annual appropriations

Removes all NEC infrastructure ownership costs from Amtrak; these costs represents about two-thirds of every Amtrak dollar lost

Can provide IMO private money as local match for federal grants

Keeps NEC commuters on avoidable cost contracts

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:29 PM

wanswheel
Excerpt from AIRNet-21 pdf

Retains US Government ownership of all Amtrak assets

Keeps Amtrak as the single national passenger carrier

Transfers $1.0 billion to Amtrak in addition to any appropriation

Spends 300% more annually than Amtrak on NEC and Midwest infrastructures

Enables over $17 billion in new projects in the first 15 years

Permits Amtrak to match passenger revenues with train costs without NEC allocations

Allows Amtrak to run entire National System for under $600 million annual appropriations

Removes all NEC infrastructure ownership costs from Amtrak; these costs represents about two-thirds of every Amtrak dollar lost

Can provide IMO private money as local match for federal grants

Keeps NEC commuters on avoidable cost contracts

 

Much of that sounds sensible.   But reservations about Amtrak  remain, based on these quotes from the article:  

"In 1995, Amtrak began to implement its Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement System (ACSES), which 20 years later has yet to be completed south of New York."  [20 years?  Unbelievable.]

"Connecticut’s Governor Malloy recently complained to the USDOT that Amtrak has repeatedly proven incapable of executing major projects on time and budget. Amtrak received about $3 billion under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—the Stimulus Act. Much of Amtrak’s stimulus money remains unspent, while Amtrak’s approved and funded infrastructure work remains unimplemented."  [Why?]

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy