Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
NEC
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Capacity constraints on the NEC (current and future) may justify upgrading the route. A key question is whether the nation needs to spend upwards of $200 billion (includes debt service costs) or whether something on a lesser scale would do the job.</p> <p>If the market is Stamford to Philadelphia or any number of intermediate points, is a 220 mph railroad the optimum solution for the problem?</p> <p>I have a great fondness for passenger trains. I ride them whenever I get the opportunity to do so. I also have a burning passion for fiscal responsibility. To lay out a proposal for upgrading the NEC or any other rail corridor without a solid plan to pay for it bothers me. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy