Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
If Amtrak carried 120 million passengers
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="blue streak 1"]</p> <p>[quote user="John WR"]</p> <p>The vast majority of our roads are for rubber tired vehicles but some of our roads are for flanged steel wheeled vehicles. But doesn't it make sense to treat all roads the same? After all we would never fund concrete roads differently than we would fund tarred roads. So why make a special exception for steel rail roads?</p> <div style="clear:both;">[/quote]</div> <p><strong>Great way to condense many arguments into a single paragraph </strong>[/quote]</p> <p>Funding should be a function of market demand. One size fits all is not a good strategy. The problem for passenger rail lies in the fact that there is little demand for it. I wish it were otherwise. It isn't! And it is not likely to be in the near future outside of a few high density corridors.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy