Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Passengers Only?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>What law(s) compelled the railroads to offer passenger services? </p> <p>I agree with your assessment of cash flows, inadequate returns, and alternative opportunities. Other than in a government bureaucracy, who in their right mind would compel a private business to offer a service that was pushing the business to the brink of extinction?</p> <p>If Amtrak had not been created, what provision of the law would have prevented the railroads from proceeding with the train off petitions until all the trains had been discontinued?</p> <p>At one point the PRR wanted to discontinue the Clevelander. I don't remember the dates. The regulator said no dice. So the railroad pared it down to a P70 coach (I rode it from New York to Altoona) and one sleeper. Subsequently, as I remember it, the railroad was able to convince the regulator that the train was losing money. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy