Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Passengers Only?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>To cover its costs and add to the bottom line, a product line (passenger train) has to have revenues to cover its direct costs, indirect costs, and allocated overheads in deriving an operating profit. Revenues would have to be sufficient to cover all administrative costs (direct and allocated) to arrive at net income before depreciation, interest, and taxes. And they would have to be sufficient to cover these variables. </p> <p>The railroads were amongst the first corporations to implement sophisticated accounting and finance systems in the U.S. I am reasonably sure that they had the ability to gather, process, and produce meaningful financial statements for each passenger train that they operated. I don't know how much of the information was made public, but they had it. </p> <p>At one time, as I remember the argument, opponents of train-off petitions argued that passenger trains lost money according to ICC accounting rules, but did not lose money or not as much money as appeared to be the case under GAAP rules. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy