Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
California HSR, why was it approved?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="MidlandMike"]</p> <p> </p> <blockquote> <div><img src="/TRCCS/Themes/trc/images/icon-quote.gif" /> <strong>Bucyrus:</strong></div> <div> <p> </p> <p> </p> <blockquote><br /></blockquote> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size:small;"> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:small;font-family:verdana, geneva;">However, the solution to the problem is indeed doing less.</span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span><span style="font-size:small;font-family:verdana, geneva;">That is exactly what will avert the problem of a spending meltdown.</span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span><span style="font-size:small;font-family:verdana, geneva;">But the California legislature is not wired for that solution, so their rail project will go forward and will speak for itself in either confirming or refuting my prediction of becoming an economic black hole.</span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span><span style="font-size:small;font-family:verdana, geneva;">I would say that it might be a large enough project to become the first example of the economic black hole.</span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"> </span></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p> </p> </div> </blockquote> <p> </p> <p>I think if other countries can figure out how to build HSR without being sucked into a black hole, we should be able to do it also. [/quote]</p> <p>Conceptually the answer is simple. Since passenger rail depends on taxes to cover its costs, especially the capital costs, raise taxes or shift the government spend priorities, i.e. take money away from another program and give it to high speed passenger rail or passenger rail in general.</p> <p>The people in most of those "other countries" pay considerably higher taxes than we do in the United States. Every time a special interest group, i.e. high speed rail advocates, reaches into your pocket, not to mention mine, no matter how well intentioned, it is taking away your freedom and mine to decided how to spend our money. </p> <p>Sometimes taking our money as well as the money of everyone else in the country is for the public good. But on many occasions it is for a narrow interest that the advocates dub the public good, e.g. like a new football stadium in Arlington, TX for the Dallas Cowboys. Accordingly, a key question regarding high speed rail is whether it is in the public interest or good along side of defense, education, housing, etc.? </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy