Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
The Boston Globe and Amtrak Long Distance
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>The long distance trains are used by approximately 4/10s of 1 per cent of intercity travelers. If they were discontinued, few people would miss them. </p> <p>If there is market (need) for public transportation in a community, i.e. smaller towns and cities, it could be met with buses. In fact, many of the smaller communities in California are served by Amtrak's connecting buses.</p> <p>If the argument is that Amtrak's long distance trains meet a vital public transport need in towns and cities without adequate air or intercity bus service, then the system should be extend to the hundreds of cities in the country that are not currently served by Amtrak. In Texas these would include Abilene, San Angelo, Brownwood, Corpus Christie, Brownsville, etc., etc., etc. These cities have little or no air service. Of course, doing so would be prohibitively expensive, especially given the debt problems of the federal and state governments. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy