Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
A Pricy Ride
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Roads do not pay for themselves. The users pay for them through fuel taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, fees, and property taxes. Unfortunately, because of the deceptive way the revenues are collected, most motorists don't see the full cost of building and maintaining the country's roads at the pump. But they pay for them.</p> <p>The guy or gal who drives a Cadillac pays a somewhat higher portion of the cost to build and maintain the nation's roads. His car gets fewer miles per gallon than most more modestly priced vehicles. In many states he pays more in fees, because of the vehicle's fair market value, to buy and operate it. Moreover, he probably lives in a better house than the Chevorlet driver, which means he pays more in property taxes, which are used to pay for most city streets and county roads. </p> <p>The issue regarding the Acela is whether it requires a subsidy that is paid by people who for the most part cannot ride it. Clearly, this is the case. All taxpayers are subsidizing the Acela as well as passenger trains in general. The underlying question, in my mind, is whether Joe Six Pack should be required to subsidize upper class riders on the Acela or any other mode of commercial transport, </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy