Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
A Contrarian View of High Speed Rail
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="al-in-chgo"] <P><STRONG>What is your idea of "hard evidence"? Physically bound printouts from the cost accounting or marketing departments at SNCF? </STRONG></P> <P>Yes!<STRONG> </STRONG>The financial information can be found in the SNCF financial statements, although they are not nearly as transparent as Amtrak's financial reports. </P> <P><STRONG>If you actually have hardcopy French statistics, shouldn't you be the one to share them with us? With actual numbers, I mean? And policy and operating decisions?</STRONG></P> <P>I did not challenge Mr. O'Toole's asertions. Data regarding the profiles of people who use the high speed rail systems in Europe and Japan are probably difficult to get. If they are available, they would show hard data, i.e. incomes, type of travel, etc. </P> <P><STRONG>The examples from other countries</STRONG> <STRONG>are to show a couple of things: (1) by reason of analogy, what has worked there <EM>might</EM> work here; and (2) no major industrialized country that has set at least a basic HSR network as a priority has failed to achieve that. Deficits of funding and technology can be made up for if the political will and social support are there.</STRONG></P> <P>If the users will not pay the full cost to use the system, either directly or indirectly, the cost falls on non-users, who for the most part are the taxpayers.</P> <P>The first question is whether the United States should build high speed rail to solve a real transport problem. The second question is whether it can afford it. If the answer is yes, then looking at what other countries do to get ideas that may be applicable here is appropriate. But building high speed rail because the Europeans and Japanese have done so is akin to adopting the budget of the family down the street irrespective of whether it meets your needs. </P> <P>With the exception of a few rants about Mr. O'Toole's political views, which are irrelevant, most of the folks who have responded to his views with some worthy ideas. However, no one has put forth a realistic plan of how to pay for the proposed high speed rail or a concrete cost/benefit analysis. </P> <P>In the business world where I spent all of my working career, if I had proposed a major project without a reasonable projection of the cost and benefits, I would have been on the street looking for another job.</P>[/quote]
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy