Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Acela - 10 Years and No Progress!
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>I was riding on Metro-North between New Haven and NY just the other day, and I have a couple comments (and questions) to ask...</p><p>For one, the track was a bit curvy. We were held to 60 MPH most of the way, and even the <i>Acela</i> couldn't do much better than 90 if it was allowed.</p><p>Also, the MU's seemed to be riding a bit rough. I saw several high-speed crossovers (without frogs; there's a second set of points in place of the frog) but there were a lot of standard switches all over the place which didn't help to make the ride glassy-smooth. And the MU sets (the older M3s, I think; no M7s here!) were showing their age and use.<br></p><p>Here's my question about that. Are the MU sets well maintained with good springs, and does the <i>Acela</i> ride better? If the MUs have old springs, their riding characteristics can be explained. They are run hard at high speeds, many hours a day, and could definetely be a bit worn. The <i>Acela</i> probably runs a lot smoother. </p><p>While the <i>Acela</i> is definetely held back to some degree, I don't think that line could be increased to anything above 125... <br></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy