Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
US High Speed Rail
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="Paul Milenkovic"] <P>[quote]Economic arguments that high-speed rail should not be "subsidized" ignore many ways that other travel options are indirectly "subsidized" or otherwise supported by our government. Most other developed nations have figured out that passenger trains are important. [/quote]</P> <P>Did I ever say trains should not be subsidized? Other people may have chimed in with that point of view, but I have never, ever stated that trains should not get subsidy.</P> <P>What I have brought up, time and again, and there are a few on this Forum who back me up on this, is that the rate of subsidy is a serious problem in getting a political constituency for yet more subsidy to get higher levels of train service.</P> <P>What is the argument for subsidizing Amtrak at the rate of 20 cents/passenger mile? What social benefit or combination of benefits (reduced energy use, and how much energy is Amtrak saving in percentage terms, by the way?) are worth that rate of subsidy?</P> <P>Is there so much inherent goodness with train travel that any rate of subsidy is justified? What is the limit to spending that someone would say, gee, we are not getting enough in return?</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P mce_keep="true">Ideally all transport subsidies could be phased out over five to seven years. They distort the market, which is the best way to allocate scarce economic resources. Each mode of transport would absorb its full cost and pass them on to the user in ticket prices and fuel taxes. Unfortunately, given the political nature of transport subsidies, this will not happen. </P> <P mce_keep="true">Passenger trains make sense in relatively short, high density corridors, especially where the cost of constructing additional highways and airways is prohibitive. In these cases, subsidizing them is justified. But subsidizing long distance trains, which require an inordinate amount of support, while serving a small per cent of intercity travelers, is not justified. By the same token, pouring massive subsidies into high speed rail, especially for a nation that has the debt profile of the U.S. is, makes no economic sense. </P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy