Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Should Amtrak....
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>"Scorn" means: 1) open dislike and disrespect or derision often mixed with indignation; 2) an expression of contempt or derision, or 3) an object of extreme disdain, contempt, or derision.</p><p>I don't think anything that I said about making bad order car information available to the general public fits the definition of scorn. I said, in a nutshell, that Amtrak did not have an obligation make this information available to people who did not have a need to know it. Moreover, I said that people with a legitimate need to know the information could get it through proper channels. And I pointed out in a follow-up posting some of the incremental cost that Amtrak could incur if it posted the information in an open net. </p><p>I did not say anything about the number of bad order cars because I don't have that information. I did, however, say that according to Amtrak's monthly operating report, during May 2008 approximately 12.4 per cent of the passenger car fleet was out of service and, moreover, for the fiscal year to date, the average percentage of bad order cars was about 14 per cent. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy