Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Passenger
»
Presidential Candidates
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>If "social service" is the justification for long distance trains, then large parts of the country are not being served properly. The system needs to be expanded greatly.</p><p>In Texas, where I live, 15 large and medium size cities do not have daily train service, which presumably is the minimum required to meet this social need. </p><p>Abilene, Amarillo, Beaumont, Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Denton, El Paso, Houston, Laredo, Lubbock, McAllen, Midland, Odessa, San Angelo, and Wichita Falls should have expanded or new passenger train service. </p><p>Adequate service for the cities served by the Sunset Limited could be provided by daily operation of the Sunset. But new trains would be required for Abilene, Amarillo, Brownsville, Corpus Christi, Denton, Laredo, Lubbock, McAllen, Midland, Odessa, San Angelo, and Wichita Falls. </p><p>Hmm! I wonder who would pay for it, since very few Texans use the two daily trains - Texas Eagle and Heartland Flyer - that serve Texas. </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy