MTA is not a local regional transit authority but a New York State Authority and as such gets subsides from Western and Upstate NY communities that have to pay High Taxes to subsdieze downstate when citys like Buffalo have not had a commuter train since 1965 and Rochester has not had a subway since 1959. Furthermore the power for the MTA NYC subways comes from Niagara Falls and the local WNY communities get no power from the falls. Any expansion of Buffalo NFTA service MUST MUST MUST as decreeded by King Coumo must come from local and federal sources as long as the NYC MTA is first in line at the federal trouth.
CSSHEGEWISCH MTA's financing is not all that different from most regional transit agencies. Most of them use a regional gasoline tax and sales tax for revenue.
MTA's financing is not all that different from most regional transit agencies. Most of them use a regional gasoline tax and sales tax for revenue.
I cannot think of a U.S. public transit system that does not rely on public funding to cover farebox shortfalls.
Farebox revenues cover a higher percentage of MTA's revenue requirements than most of the systems that I have looked at. The only one that covers a higher percentage is San Diego.
Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII
As Balt said - "Smoke and Mirrors". (No Sarcasm)
CandOforprogress2 Is there some sort of regional tax?
I lived in Poughkeepsie from 1979 to early 1995. In the early 80s the sales tax in the regions served by the Metro-North was raised by, as I recall, 2%. This went directly to the railroad and it improved remarkably over the years.
Smoke & Mirrors! [/sarcasm]
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Is there some sort of regional tax?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.