Trains.com

Low Ridership on LA Metrolink vs Boston MBTA

1273 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 294 posts
Low Ridership on LA Metrolink vs Boston MBTA
Posted by trackrat888 on Monday, February 16, 2015 5:15 PM

11 Million Riders LA Metrolink on 388 miles of route vs MBTA Boston Purple Lines with 35 Million Riders and also 380 miles of routes. Could it be that Bostons Downtown core is bigger? Could it also be that LA Union Station Location is not condusive to commuter rail (BTW its right next to the jail)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,932 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, February 16, 2015 5:32 PM

Could be the the rail commuter is a long existing reality in the Boston area and a new 'toy' in LA.  Any service takes time to build it's cliental, mass transit is no exception.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,785 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, February 16, 2015 5:55 PM

Nobody works in Downtown LA (dump) ...nor the same dynamic as MBTA and Boston....more like going burb to burb, skipping downtown.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,824 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, February 16, 2015 6:55 PM

BaltACD

Could be the the rail commuter is a long existing reality in the Boston area and a new 'toy' in LA.  Any service takes time to build it's cliental, mass transit is no exception.

 
Balt is on the right track.
Boston is an in close community with not every house having 2 cars.  The LA service area seems to have a parking problems at many of their stations.  Also a longer drive to a station in LA.  Different lines in Boston are much closer than in LA.  Just look at the number lines in each area.
An interesting study might be a comparsion of the number of passengers from out lying stations.  Again with no passenger mile figures it is really difficult to compare.
 
    
  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 294 posts
Posted by trackrat888 on Monday, February 16, 2015 7:26 PM

Just read the Latest trains issue and saw system by system breakdown

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,860 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, February 16, 2015 8:40 PM

It's long been my opinion that what destroyed many transit systems was the decentralization of commerce.  The big employers used to be concentrated in certain areas - chiefly downtown and in industrial areas.  Mass transportation catered well to that, gathering people up and taking them to those concentrated areas.  The major retailers (department stores, etc) were also downtown, meaning the occasional trip "into town" for special shopping.

The grown of the suburbs, with malls (and smaller strip malls / shopping centers), as well as the exodus of businesses from city centers meant those trunk lines were no longer viable.  As was mentioned, a lot of people now need to go "across town," as opposed to downtown.

That's not to say that all cities have gone that route, but I suspect that it really complicates planning for newer transit systems.  The hub and spoke just isn't as relevant as it used to be.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy