Trains.com

30+ hurt when CTA train jumps platform at O'Hare

7725 views
35 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
30+ hurt when CTA train jumps platform at O'Hare
Posted by schlimm on Monday, March 24, 2014 8:03 AM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Monday, March 24, 2014 9:03 AM

All the articles are saying that "excessive speed may be involved". That train climbed about 10 vertical feet up a staircase!

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, March 24, 2014 9:19 AM

It's interesting that it was the conductor's, and not the engineer's decision to take the escalator.

Johnny

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, March 24, 2014 10:00 AM

Deggesty

It's interesting that it was the conductor's, and not the engineer's decision to take the escalator.

CTA Rapid Transit trains are one-man operation with only a motorman and no conductor.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Monday, March 24, 2014 10:19 AM

Thanks, Paul. Please tell the people in Chicago who commented that it was the conductor's fault.

Johnny

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Monday, March 24, 2014 10:38 AM

The stairs would have been a healthier choice.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Monday, March 24, 2014 12:29 PM
Maybe the train was late for a plane. :-)
Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Monday, March 24, 2014 12:31 PM
On the serious side how is CTA going to get this back on the tracks?
Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 24, 2014 1:24 PM

How did this happen with all the technology CTA has ? Can we expect the same "glitches" with PTS?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,914 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Monday, March 24, 2014 1:41 PM

OK, so first I am flashing back to "Silver Streak" and its climax.  

Then I am thinking how lucky it was that was around three in the morning, when the trains are probably not arriving at eight-minute intervals and the up escalator was probably not occupied.

I suspect the bus-to-Rosemont detour will run for a couple of weeks while they get the trainset out and the escalator fixed.  In the meantime, a few scary mental images will be running around my skull.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, March 24, 2014 1:56 PM

I recently observed while arriving at the Midway terminal that there is a sign indicating to "begin operation on sight" just before reaching the terminal platforms.  Presumably, this means that the train stop equipment does not operate beyond this point, although lower speeds have been enforced prior to reaching this point.  There may be a similar arrangement at the O'Hare terminal.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Monday, March 24, 2014 2:27 PM
FWIW A picture of the accident location without the train.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/CTA_blue_line_O%27Hare.jpg/1024px-CTA_blue_line_O%27Hare.jpg

A question and comment. Is this track straight in from the inbound track? If this not a mechanical failure of the control equipment might fatigue have been the cause.

Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, March 24, 2014 3:42 PM

Update: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-ohare-train-crash-20140324,0,1750012.story

Union chief: Operator of CTA train that crashed 'might have dozed off'

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, March 24, 2014 3:45 PM

Randy Stahl

How did this happen with all the technology CTA has ? Can we expect the same "glitches" with PTS?

For a simple reason: "Unlike other American rail lines, the CTA does not have an automated system in place to stop trains as they approach a station or other points along the track." 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 24, 2014 4:31 PM

The obvious solution to a train operator is to implement two man crews. Its safer on a freight train why not a passenger train?

 

R

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, March 24, 2014 4:37 PM

This is a rapid transit system...where is the automatic stop system?  automatic speed control?  

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,479 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, March 25, 2014 7:09 AM

CTA has had such a system in place for a long time.  However, even the best system has limitations when it comes to operations in a terminal such as O'Hare or Midway, where on-sight operation will be required at some point.

As anybody who has worked overnight shifts knows, it can be difficult to stay completely alert on the night shift even when you came on duty properly rested.  You're always somewhat out of sync and a job with a fair amount of repetition doesn't help, either.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by Falcon48 on Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:13 PM

Since I know virtually nothing about the actual facts of this accident, and since ignorance is bliss, let me make a thoroughly uneducated guess as to the cause of this accident:

The train was not operating at "excessive speed".  The speed was probably quite low (15 mph or less).  What happened was that the train powered itself through the bumping post and up the escalator.  

My reasons for this guess are as follows:

1.  I don't believe that CTA uses manual brake trips at O' Hare (although it's been a long time since I've been there, so I could be wrong).  Rather, I believe the signal system reduces train speed to 15 mph, and then depends on the operator to run "on sight ".  In other words, subject to all the excuses and caveats previously stated, if the train was running under 15 mph, it could keep going without any "penalty" stop.

2.  The contollers on this particular series of cars work by pushing the controller away from the operator toward the front of the car for acceleration, and pulling it back toward the operator for braking.

3.  The train length reported in the press is 8 cars (I'll leave  to others the question of why CTA would be running 8 car trains at 3 AM).

So, here's my scenario.  The train approaches the bumping post at a speed under 15 mph (so the signal system doesn't stop the train).  Because the operator has dozed off - possibly just moments before the impact - the train continues to move (it's entirely possible the operator dozed off with her hand on the controller in a way that the "dead man" wouldn't kick in).  The train hits the bumping post.  This throws the operator's body forward, pushing the controller to an acceleration position. Since the train never gets to 15 mph, the signal system doesn't stop the train.   The front cars get severe damage.  But the rear cars continue to power forward, pushing the front cars through the bumping post, and station platform and up the escalator, until the operator recovers and takes her hand off the controller (which trips the dead man).

Again, this is all speculation.  But CTA had another serious accident  over 30 years ago where a train powered itself off the 'L' structure in the Loop after rear-ending another train on a sharp curve.  Once again, the "striking" train had a controller which operated just like the controller on the O'Hare train - pushing the handle away from the operator toward the front of the train caused acceleration.  So, when the train hit the train ahead of it, the operator fell forward in a way that applied power to the train.

We'll see when the NTSB finishes its work if any of this speculation matches reality (probably not).

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,932 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:50 AM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:32 PM

http://www.today.com/video/today/54781415#54781415

this may be the first time I've seen an accurate internet headline. http://www.msn.com/ said "Dramatic video of train crash"

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    March 2014
  • 78 posts
Posted by Polish Falcon on Saturday, March 29, 2014 7:32 PM

Anti-Climber? just throwing that out there...

OK OK Maybe because of the ant-climber the train did not telescope on itself.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:36 AM

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Sunday, April 6, 2014 11:32 AM

Reports are that the CTA has fired the operator.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,932 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, April 7, 2014 2:52 PM

NorthWest

Reports are that the CTA has fired the operator.

Not a surprise.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 7, 2014 3:23 PM

Like most things, the cause is not so simple as to be only the sleeping operator:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-preliminary-report-released-on-ohare-cta-crash-20140407,0,613865.story?track=rss

A preliminary report into the cause of a spectacular CTA Blue Line crash at O’Hare International Airport said today the distance between a device in the tracks designed to stop the train and a bumper post at the end of the line was “too short to stop the train” due to its speed. The report by the National Transportation Safety Board said that “seconds before the derailment last month the train was traveling about 26 mph as it crossed a fixed trip stop that activated the train emergency braking system.”

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Monday, April 7, 2014 3:57 PM

Polish Falcon

Anti-Climber? just throwing that out there...

OK OK Maybe because of the ant-climber the train did not telescope on itself.

If there had been an anti climber on the train and the bumper there would have been fatalities on the train.  The harm is done by the sudden stop.  What was needed was an energy absorbing over run area at the end of the line.  I, on the other hand, would prefer an auto stop mechanism of some kind on the train.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 7, 2014 6:27 PM

Phoebe Vet
I, on the other hand, would prefer an auto stop mechanism of some kind on the train.

The auto-stop triggering mechanism was set too close to the end of the line to stop the train in time if it exceeded 25 mph.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Monday, April 7, 2014 6:34 PM

Then it needs to be redesigned.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, April 7, 2014 8:06 PM

Phoebe Vet

Then it needs to

be redesigned.

Definitely.  Goes to show that accidents are not always only the fault of operating employees.  

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy