Trains.com

Minnesota Metro Transit Trains run at -20 F. What's your excuse?

4038 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:02 AM

Atlanta is not flatland.  With snow and ice, any change in elevation, up or down, becomes a exciting proposition.  Going up, you can't make the summit.  Going down, you can't get stopped before you hit something at the bottom.

From a railroad perspective - there are NO SWITCH HEATERS to melt snow and railroad personnel must use the same highway system as everyone else to be able to respond to issues that prevent the movement of trains.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 55 posts
Posted by Phelps on Monday, February 3, 2014 9:49 PM

Just out of curiosity I checked the performance of Amtrak Nos 19 and 20, the Cresent, departing and arriving Atlanta at the height of their big weather fiasco.

On Tuesday evening, Jan. 28, when the highways were at a standstill, the northbound Crescent departed on schedule.

On Wednesday morning, when the highways were slooooooowly being cleared, the southbound Crescent was 2++ hours late arriving...but it did arrive.

There's a message there.

Dave Phelps

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Sunday, February 2, 2014 3:57 AM
By floridad

on Tuesday, January 28, 2014

it is snowing in the panhandal of florida and we still run train?


Yes but look what a little snow storm did to Atlanta.

Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 25 posts
Posted by floridad on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:32 PM
it is snowing in the panhandal of florida and we still run train?
Tags: fec
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:16 PM

Aw c'mon man, -20 in Minnesota's a heat wave!  Now for the rest of us...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:27 PM

But it is not just the equipment and track, it is also the toll on those who have to work in the cold...they slow down, make mistakes....and speaking of people, it is the customers, the riders, who may stay home or slow down and have accidents, too. Then there is standing in the cold waiting for a late train....how many stations are nothing more than school bus shelters?   I am sure there is a lot of legalese being thrown around, too,  like if something happens to somebody, somebody is going to sue somebody...etc.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 25 posts
Posted by floridad on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:03 PM

Coolremember that in the fifties they said there were union members who were paid to do nothing. however when push came to shove both freight and theirGeeked passenger equipment wenr to work 24/7/365. u did not tell the trainmaster some crybaby thumbsucking reason ur train could not run. if u did u would not be called up again.

Tags: fec
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:59 PM

Dakguy201

KCSfan

And why not? I just read the Amtrak service alerts listing all the trains running to/from Chicago that are cancelled due to the weather. Not a single Superliner train is cancelled so it seems like this equipment is doing just fine in near record breaking absolute and wind chill temperatures.

Mark

There were no Superliner cancellations yesterday, but there were late starts that in all probability were weather related.  The Builder was 48 minutes late out of Chicago, the Capitol 2:22 late and the Lake Shore (a non-Superliner) 2:38.  

Yes, most likely weather related but I doubt if they were due to any problems with the Superliner equipment itself. I think more probably due to conditions on the host freight railroads, locomotive issues or servicing delays in the extreme cold.

Mark

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:52 PM

Let's not brag it up too much, the Northstar line was delayed an hour or two due to a stuck turnout, and I understand the Hiawatha line in Bloomington had similar delays due to the need to clear drifted snow from the tracks caused by the snow followed by 40+ MPH wind gusts over the weekend.

 

Stix
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:06 PM

KCSfan

schlimm

CMStPnP

Relatively new equipment and infrastructure makes all the difference.      You might not have been born yet but Amtrak operated Superliners in similar weather back when they were new.     Probably can't do the same today.


Maybe.  I can remember riding the CNW when they were still using very old heavyweight (and old aluminum) suburban cars along with the new bi-levels.  Some were pulled by Gp-7's; some by class E 4-6-2's.   Both did fine in cold weather.  You can probably remember the same on the Milwaukee Road.

In the 1950's I commuted daily in all kinds of weather on the IC and on the E-L from 1961-65 in the old rattan seat cars with old catenary and signal systems. Only once did the trains run late! That exception was due to ice on the E-L catenary and even then we were only 15 minutes late arriving in Hoboken. I think one difference between then and now is commitment. It seems that now cancellations are ordered just in anticipation of adverse weather. 

 

Another difference is a sharply reduced workforce.   In the 1950's you had a full section crew every ten miles of a double-track main line.  Today, with track maintenance mechanization, you probably have three crews for an entire division.  It takes men to shovel snow and scrape ice off catenary.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:29 PM

KCSfan

And why not? I just read the Amtrak service alerts listing all the trains running to/from Chicago that are cancelled due to the weather. Not a single Superliner train is cancelled so it seems like this equipment is doing just fine in near record breaking absolute and wind chill temperatures.

Mark

There were no Superliner cancellations yesterday, but there were late starts that in all probability were weather related.  The Builder was 48 minutes late out of Chicago, the Capitol 2:22 late and the Lake Shore (a non-Superliner) 2:38.    

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:07 PM

schlimm

CMStPnP

Relatively new equipment and infrastructure makes all the difference.      You might not have been born yet but Amtrak operated Superliners in similar weather back when they were new.     Probably can't do the same today.


Maybe.  I can remember riding the CNW when they were still using very old heavyweight (and old aluminum) suburban cars along with the new bi-levels.  Some were pulled by Gp-7's; some by class E 4-6-2's.   Both did fine in cold weather.  You can probably remember the same on the Milwaukee Road.

In the 1950's I commuted daily in all kinds of weather on the IC and on the E-L from 1961-65 in the old rattan seat cars with old catenary and signal systems. Only once did the trains run late! That exception was due to ice on the E-L catenary and even then we were only 15 minutes late arriving in Hoboken. I think one difference between then and now is commitment. It seems that now cancellations are ordered just in anticipation of adverse weather. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM

CMStPnP

Relatively new equipment and infrastructure makes all the difference.      You might not have been born yet but Amtrak operated Superliners in similar weather back when they were new.     Probably can't do the same today.

And why not? I just read the Amtrak service alerts listing all the trains running to/from Chicago that are cancelled due to the weather. Not a single Superliner train is cancelled so it seems like this equipment is doing just fine in near record breaking absolute and wind chill temperatures.

Mark

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 591 posts
Posted by petitnj on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:20 AM

Definitely an advantage to have 10 year old equipment instead of 50 year old commuter cars. 

The only problem with buses,  Northstar trains and light rail trains is the excessive noise of the heating systems. The ventilation systems are deafening when they turn on. It makes it almost uncomfortable to sit in the Northstar cars. Bring your headphones for noise reduction. 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:12 AM

EXCUSE THE GRAYING    COMPUTER GLITCH   HOW TO GET RID OF IT?

There is a problem with old-style catenary, which modern constant-tension wieghted catenary solves in extreme cold weather.  Then there is the problem of signal and power components that should have been replaced years ago, still in use beyond the useful  lifespan.

In 1967-1970 I had opporunnitites to compare the harshness of winter between Chicago and Minneapollis.  Chicago was harsher, even with higher temperatures, because of greater wind and humidity.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:23 AM

CMStPnP

Relatively new equipment and infrastructure makes all the difference.      You might not have been born yet but Amtrak operated Superliners in similar weather back when they were new.     Probably can't do the same today.


Maybe.  I can remember riding the CNW when they were still using very old heavyweight (and old aluminum) suburban cars along with the new bi-levels.  Some were pulled by Gp-7's; some by class E 4-6-2's.   Both did fine in cold weather.  You can probably remember the same on the Milwaukee Road.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 25 posts
Posted by floridad on Monday, January 27, 2014 8:39 PM

Coolit is many resons. one mightGeeked be more expereince with sevear wether?

Tags: fec
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Monday, January 27, 2014 8:25 PM

Relatively new equipment and infrastructure makes all the difference.      You might not have been born yet but Amtrak operated Superliners in similar weather back when they were new.     Probably can't do the same today.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 591 posts
Minnesota Metro Transit Trains run at -20 F. What's your excuse?
Posted by petitnj on Monday, January 27, 2014 7:57 PM

Kudos to Metrotransit here in Minneapolis/St.Paul. Trains and buses are running flawlessly at -20 with a wind chill of -40 F. The only accommodation that the light rail makes is that the doors have to be opened by pushing the door button at each station. That saves heat in the cars. Workers were out inspecting the crossovers at Hennepin Avenue this morning but everything works. 

Send some of your folks here and find out how to run a railroad. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy