Trains.com

bus proponents take heed

1872 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
bus proponents take heed
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 4:52 PM

A study in the UK  shows a large % of rail passengers do not like bus substitutions. Granted this is the UK but it may even be worse in the USA ?

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/passenger/single-view/view/engineering-work-from-the-passenger-perspective.html

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 5:29 PM

Well sure, buses are smelly.  Ever get stuck behind one?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 5:55 PM

Travel or motion sickness is more prevalent on buses than any other form of transportation from what travel agency experts have told me.  Looking at busitutions on the LIRR and NJT/MNRR Port Jervis service informs passengers that travel times will be 30 to 60 minutes longer than by train, to show up 30 minutes earlier on some schedules and add 30 more minutes for arrival times.  SO, yeah, if one can avoid bustitutions, I believe they will.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 10:33 PM

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 10:48 PM

Not sure what happened just now - my text disappeared when I hit the POST button.

In general, those who travel by train often pay a premium when they select that mode over a bus, to enjoy a more comfortable environment.   If they wanted to ride a bus that would have been their choice ahead of time.  VIA Rail was notorious for frequent bustitutions on some of their RDC routes.  Passenger loyalty vanished, followed shortly by the train service itself.

In Britain my experience was that buses were often just used to bridge the work area, and mostly on weekends.  That required two modal transfers, which is why many riders will tolerate a longer travel time to remain on the train without interruption.  Unfortunately, just as in North America, extensive line abandonments mean that practicable detour routes often no longer exist.

John

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy