Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Transit
»
Public Transit Ridership in the United States
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="John WR"]</p> <p>[quote user="Sam1"]I agree with taxpayer in-city transit. A significant percentage of it provides transportation to low income people. I have a problem having the taxpayers pick-up part of the commuter cost for a Wall Street Bank earning a half a million a year.[/quote]</p> <p>Commuter trains serve people of all income levels from the highest to the lowest. Once a commuter train is in operation conventional wisdom is that the commuter authority should try to get a maximum number of riders. To institute a means test so that people above a certain income level would be prohibited from riding the train is, again, counter intuitive. [/quote]</p> <p>Here is a way for the commuter transit authority to maximize ridership. Make it free! That's what Austin tried a few years ago with its bus system. In addition to nearly wrecking the city's finances, the buses attracted heaps of street people, who in turn drove away the few middle class riders who used the bus.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy