Trains.com

The Public Utility Holding Company Act

810 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 333 posts
The Public Utility Holding Company Act
Posted by ontheBNSF on Monday, April 8, 2013 4:03 PM

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/cpt/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/The-Pubic-Utility-Holding-Act-of-1935-Rev-2.doc

I think combining utilities with railways might be the way to go. Cross subsidization might not be the way to go but a combined bill offering both railway and electricity service might be the way to go. Removing other restrictions on electric railway companies should also be done as well such price fixing which is still in effect in New York. Anyways the article does a good job of describing the disastrous effects of PUHCA. The PUHCA was created under logic similar to glass-steagall which is to separate companies. Some of the restrictions are still effect.

Railroad to Freedom

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, April 8, 2013 4:28 PM

AGREE      AND FOR ME THE BREAKUP OF AT&T WAS A MISTAKE

  • Member since
    August 2012
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by John WR on Monday, April 8, 2013 7:59 PM

daveklepper
AGREE      AND FOR ME THE BREAKUP OF AT&T WAS A MISTAKE

Dave,  

I'm with you here.  John

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, April 8, 2013 8:23 PM

Well, it certainly turned our economic system virtually upside down, changed the way of doing business for ever and made bottom line accounting the ruling grade for all products and services.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:37 AM

The Public Utility Companies Holding Act was a by-product of the frenzied finance of the 1920's and should be considered in that light.  The public continues to gripe about utility rates and it would be a lot harder to justify an electric bill that helps subsidize a money-losing interurban railway or suburban operation.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 252 posts
Posted by Bonas on Tuesday, April 9, 2013 7:30 AM

It was repealed about 4 years ago...The PUCH was responsible for the demise of the Interurbans because the power lines now had to be seprarated from the interurbans that ran benieth them in ownership...The railroads could get in the power buisness now and the power companys can now build there own railroads to haul there own coal....only a couple of mine to plant operations exist...now its more of a barging chip

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, April 9, 2013 9:17 AM

Please correct me if wrong  --- was AMTRAK prevented in the past from going into some power business due to this act ?.  I seem to vaguely remember that it was distribution using ROW  but that is very fuzzy ??? 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy