...coming up! Should be fun. I'll bet there are more vibrations coming out of the womens' dorms than the transit system would produce. The NIMBYs are alive and well.
As I understand it, the current issue isn't even about the trains per se, but rather the need to re-route some auto traffic this summer in order to do street work as a preliminary to tracks being laid - kinda like what's being done now in downtown St.Paul.
Doesn't the U of MN basicly (sp?) estivate during the summer? Would they rather have the work done when the 'academic' year is in full-swing? No, you can't ever satisfy a NIMBY or a gopher! Uff da!
Hays
The University of Minnesota has created a whole website with corporate speak trying to defend their position on the Central Corridor. http://www.lightrail.umn.edu/
In their press releases and videos there is not one single actual measurement or fact that shows how the light rail will affect research facilities. The only numbers are research dollars. There is a faculty report that lists attainable standards, but apparently faculty reports don't mean as much as VP press releases. The truth is that the vibrations and electromagnetic fields are too small to measure and the U is just throwing up a smoke screen.
The real reason for this problem is that the University of Minnesota is a separate entity (not part of the State of Minnesota or the cities if Minneapolis or St. Paul). Being separate it thinks it owns the land on which it resides and thus can insist on demanding that the light rail get an easement across "its" property. Yes the state legislature doesn't have control over the University because the University is its own country. The only thing the state does is write checks to support the University.
This is all just a lawyer full-employment act.
And yes the University is empty during the summer but certainly these research projects go on year-around. From the sound of the faculty reports, it appears that the Central Corridor folks have done enough to prevent interference with the nearby labs. The University is still not satisfied
The dispute has been given to arbitration as it is now starting to hold up progress on the Central Corridor. Hopefully the arbitrator will have better luck than the Central Corridor folks on satisfying the University.
Why don't they rename it "University of the Holy See in Minnesota" or "University of the District of Columbia - West"? The state pays the bills, but has no oversight? The inmates are running the asylum! Jeg forstar ikke! Uff da meg da! Slukk lyset! Ha en fin dag!
Hays -- Vil du ha en liten skvett akevitt?
According to trans new wire the U of MN collasped just under the threat of legislative action. Now we will see if they try to delay or stop the work otherwise. U of MN appears to be very arrogant. When is the next legislative session?i
Yes, the very day that the legislators were to vote to condemn the street running through the University, they (the University) agreed to the arbitrator's position that design can continue and the easement will be provided. This is an amazing case of NIMBY.
And (shhhh, don't tell anybody) wait until they discover that there is a significant increase in Ozone near the sparking overhead line. I sure hope they don't discover this.
BTW, the faculty paper proposed that the train run on batteries when passing through the University to ensure that no EMF was propagated. The EMF from the beat up Toyotas running down the avenue is 100 times more intense than that from the light rail. This street is a major thoroughfare through the campus. The Central Corridor will cut in 1/2 the number of buses running on that street. That will be nice!
I think that the school served as a point man for a lot of people who wanted the light rail line built somewhere else or not at all, not unlike the Mayo Clinic in Rochester.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.