Trains.com

How are transit agencys coping?

1850 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
How are transit agencys coping?
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:38 AM
Since METRA is increasing service on 3 lines May 19 maybe all posters should keep us informed on any routes that are overloaded. Give equipment and T & E training issues as well and what the agencys are saying in public.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:42 PM

 blue streak 1 wrote:
Since METRA is increasing service on 3 lines May 19 maybe all posters should keep us informed on any routes that are overloaded. Give equipment and T & E training issues as well and what the agencys are saying in public.

I think that's a great idea because if the noob riders stereotype Metra service as overcrowded or slow, or if the trains are perceived as dangerous, they'll go back to their cars when-or-if gas prices go down.  Apparently there is no limit to the no. of times citizens have to be told that train tracks carry danger. 

And IMO Metra should think sooner rather than later about hiking its fares -- somewhat.  That was a big mistake they made in the early Eighties, holding down the fares for so long that when it became inevitable, it was a huge increase and drove hitherto-satisfied riders away.  Increased ridership may not be a huge boon to ticket-sale revenues if Metra must spend commensurately to keep up with the crowds.  IIRC Metra gets only about thirty-five percent of its operating budget straight out of the farebox, while in the NYC metro area NJT and MN have to get about twice that budget amount from the farebox -- resulting in higher fares.  Metra riders not already in the know might well be shocked how much NJT or M-N tickets can cost, esp. M-N.  (I don't know about LIRR.)

The old CNW had the right idea -- pass along less painful increases as their expenses rise.  I think people will understand that all Metra lines except one require diesel fuel, but there needs to be some PR or advertising to put that idea in their minds first. 

Now if these steps are sensible, whether they can be accomplished without politicization is another mater.  - a.s.

 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:37 PM
AL: Correct the fares on METRA appear low as compared with other agencys. Let us know what the pols are saying.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Thursday, May 15, 2008 2:05 AM

 blue streak 1 wrote:
AL: Correct the fares on METRA appear low as compared with other agencys. Let us know what the pols are saying.

Right now rail-transit topics in the media seem to have been usurped by the CN/purchase of EJ&E/possible double-tracking imbroglio.  I'll try to keep my ear to the ground a little better.  -a.s.

al-in-chgo

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy