These are fun BUT involve a proportion of fossil carbon. Personally I'd rather see subsidized industrial effort go into zero-net-carbon and then full zero-carbon alternatives. With some care, blue hydrogen (which with sequestration is a zero-carbon approach) can be reasonably cost-effectively built out with zero-net-carbon energy. Some of that might be construable as virtue signaling, but it also shows a good engineer's sense of detail design integrity.
I'd like to see a syn-diesel made from coal gas and it's associated CO2 byproduct in a blue form. Sort of a CGTD similiar to how GTL from NG feedstocks using the Fischer-Tropsch process.
charlie hebdoAFAIK, the Wehrmacht had some pulverized coal trucks due to severe petrol shortages.
The key is that a side-valve (F or L-head) flathead long-stroke/undersquare engine is suited to run on very lean fuel with slow combustion -- those were common in the days of primitive gasoline composition, but not now (for a variety of largely good reasons!) and while periodically someone will dust off gas-producer systems -- I remember seeing a couple touted in the 'energy independence' days of mid-Seventies misery -- none of them was particularly desirable.
charlie hebdoThere is no market for such a thing now in an era where AGCC is a crisis.
There did remain some use for solvent extraction of 'renewable' carbon, e.g. from torrefied biomass, but with current concentration on full zero-carbon rather than zero-net-carbon that, too, can be deprecated as a subject for active research.
On the other hand, the free-piston gasifier remains an interesting technology, particularly with the advent of practical variable-geometry power turbines.
There is no market for such a thing now in an era where AGCC is a crisis.
AFAIK, the Wehrmacht had some pulverized coal trucks due to severe petrol shortages.
BEAUSABREBring back EMD's FG9!
https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/570032/
Here's a little entertainment-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Anbm8a-HT9s
Bring back EMD's FG9 !
EMD FG9 Locomotive (utahrails.net)
SD70DudeHere's an old thread on a prototype GE locomotive with a FDL engine that was converted to run on pulverized coal slurry.
This is a coal-water slurry, so an appreciable part of the piston thrust is actually steam and the NOx is reduced. Supposedly the injector-wear issue was solved by using grown diamonds, and they got the liner wear down from 6x to 2x that of a standard FDL... but they are oddly silent on the engine lubrication consequences of excess water vapor in the charge. The interesting thing to me is that they made comparable horsepower at full 1050rpm in a 12-cylinder motor...
... unfortunately with extremely high CO2 emission, something acceptable in the early '80s but far less so now. It was certainly a better potential answer than any of the external-combustion proposals at the time!
The coal-fired Cadillac had a turbine, not a compression-ignition piston engine.
Here's an old thread on a prototype GE locomotive with a FDL engine that was converted to run on pulverized coal slurry.
http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/741/t/136871.aspx
Greetings from Alberta
-an Articulate Malcontent
Somebody mentioned a Coal burning deisal Eldorado Cadillac..also Rudolph Deisal .made designs for a coal dust powered deisal piston engine..how would that be fired
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.