zugmannever see those NS low-nosed EMDs (sd40-2s maybe) that had the Keebler elf door to get to the toilet? There was no step down like in 99% of the other engines. So the door was only 4' tall.
.
zugmann jeffhergert I don't remember if it was the SD50 or SD60 that they had mounted a big electrical box on the wall facing the toilet. Neither sitting or standing were options. I couldn't even get in the compartment. Obviously the one who planned that layout was never going to use those "facilities". Now they have the racks of PTC crap that forces the toilet into odd places. What is old is new again. ever see those NS low-nosed EMDs (sd40-2s maybe) that had the Keebler elf door to get to the toilet? There was no step down like in 99% of the other engines. So the door was only 4' tall.
jeffhergert I don't remember if it was the SD50 or SD60 that they had mounted a big electrical box on the wall facing the toilet. Neither sitting or standing were options. I couldn't even get in the compartment. Obviously the one who planned that layout was never going to use those "facilities".
Now they have the racks of PTC crap that forces the toilet into odd places.
What is old is new again.
ever see those NS low-nosed EMDs (sd40-2s maybe) that had the Keebler elf door to get to the toilet? There was no step down like in 99% of the other engines. So the door was only 4' tall.
We had doors like that on some of the low nose EMDs. Not only was the toilet down there, but the cut outs for cab signals and train control, too.
Jeff
jeffhergertI don't remember if it was the SD50 or SD60 that they had mounted a big electrical box on the wall facing the toilet. Neither sitting or standing were options. I couldn't even get in the compartment. Obviously the one who planned that layout was never going to use those "facilities".
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.
BigJim Posted by zardoz on Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:01 PM IAFarmer Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too. Or how about the small toilet compartment on a SD50: too short to be able to stand up and pee, and too small to sit. They would have made a nice facility for a kid's fort. That's not true for the N&W's high hood GP-40's.
Posted by zardoz on Saturday, January 26, 2019 1:01 PM IAFarmer Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too. Or how about the small toilet compartment on a SD50: too short to be able to stand up and pee, and too small to sit. They would have made a nice facility for a kid's fort.
IAFarmer Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too.
Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too.
Or how about the small toilet compartment on a SD50: too short to be able to stand up and pee, and too small to sit. They would have made a nice facility for a kid's fort.
That's not true for the N&W's high hood GP-40's.
-----------------
Jeff, you may be right regarding the SD60's; I just cannot remember any issues with those. But those 7000-series were awful.
Twice over the years I stopped my train so I could either use the can in another unit, or better yet, go to a gas station or restaurant to use their facilities. Got called in for doing that once; took the Trainmaster up on the unit and asked him to show me how to use the toilet. After a peek in the unit's nose, the smart-ass know-nothing quickly got off the locomotive, and I never heard another word regarding the incident.
i thought it was both the 50's and 60's had the tiny toilet area with a giant cab signal box where you would need to fit.
jeffhergert zardoz IAFarmer Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too. Or how about the small toilet compartment on a SD50: too short to be able to stand up and pee, and too small to sit. They would have made a nice facility for a kid's fort. I don't remember if it was the SD50 or SD60 that they had mounted a big electrical box on the wall facing the toilet. Neither sitting or standing were options. I couldn't even get in the compartment. Obviously the one who planned that layout was never going to use those "facilities". Jeff
zardoz IAFarmer Dont forget the small cab doors on the old toasters too. Or how about the small toilet compartment on a SD50: too short to be able to stand up and pee, and too small to sit. They would have made a nice facility for a kid's fort.
I don't remember if it was the SD50 or SD60 that they had mounted a big electrical box on the wall facing the toilet. Neither sitting or standing were options. I couldn't even get in the compartment. Obviously the one who planned that layout was never going to use those "facilities".
ATSFGuy Were GP40's liked by crews? Did they pull well?
Were GP40's liked by crews? Did they pull well?
I loved them. They'd go like h e double l. The one consist that I wanted but never got was five GP40's. That would have been one worm burner consist!!!
Never driven a locomotive before, but going off of physical qualities, I would go with a Cab unit. Stylish, classic, and a bit closer to the ground. Based on construction, Genesis' and Chargers are basically modern cab units and I wouldn't mind seeing either on passenger on freight turns. After all, the EMD 103 was a cab unit
ATSFGuyThe cab doors looked to be the actual size for a human being to fit through, did crews have trouble getting in and out?
The fun started when you needed to board one from somewhere on the ground rather than a typical Northeast Corridor high-level platform. Especially with a grip...
Are you refering to Amtrak's now retired AEM7 Fleet?
The cab doors looked to be the actual size for a human being to fit through, did crews have trouble getting in and out?
ATSFGuy climb up the side ladders of a Surfliner F59PHI
GE fixed the steps beginning with the Dash-9 series. Everything before that was too steep.
Big Jim;
Regarding my last statement, I was saying when railroads like SF, UP, CSX, and NS have large locomotive rosters, it will always be mixed up so you'll get a different locomotive on the point and even a different power setup on the head end.
I have never worked on the railroad in general, but I have been around trains my whole life and have a pretty good understanding of them.I once got to climb up the side ladders of a Surfliner F59PHI to see the cab after the train pulled into LA Union Station. I was a kid at the time and both the conductor and engineer gave me and my grandma special permission. I have also been inside the cab of a C44-9W at Fullerton Railroad Days. :)
Thank you for pointing out the step issue, was unaware of that. Did the GE Dash 8's and 9's have that problem as well? Did the crews not like them because of that? At what unit did GE correct the issue?
The maintaining feature pretty much is the equalizing res. Big Jim is right, the most common cause for failure to maintain is the air gauge O Rings. EQ leakage is supposed to be ZERO !
As for the engine type, I don't really care as long as it gets me over the road.
Yeah, there were a few of those steps around. Never did understand the reasoning for those.
I'm sure you had some of those 5000 gp38 high hoods with those knee buster steps. Big platform step, then the littel middle step, then the platform. It's like the worst of both ladders and steps.
ATSFGuy Would you prefer a Cab Unit or a Hood Unit? To me, I would take a cab unit over a low-nose hood unit because you have to be a contortionist to go to the bathroom on a low-nose unit. If it is a High Hood unit with a walk-in toilet, and the N&W/NS had some, there would be little difference. Which Unit is easier when it comes to Maintenance and Servicing? N/A Cab Units require you to climb up the side ladders to reach the cab. Whereas on a Hood Unit, you walk up the steps to the front porch, unlock the nose door, open it, walk up a mini entry and your inside the locomotive. Here is where we find out that you have never worked on the RR. For the most part the steps are the same. The exceptions were the GE units before the Dash-9. Before the Dash-9, the steps were like a ladder and it was no fun climbing. EMD always had good steps to climb. Why it took GE so long to realize this mistake (and there were others) is beyond me. Some friends of mine told me they could climb up and down from a Cab Unit on a daily basis, while others said they'd injure themselves and might fall. Climbing up is no problem. The correct way to come down is BACKWARDS and that is a Safety Rule! I think Hood Units are easier to enter than Cab Units, but since the locomotives always rotate every day, you'll never know what you'll get next. How would you know? Actually, on Cab Units it depends a lot on which side to try to mount. Pick the correct side and it's a piece of cake!
Would you prefer a Cab Unit or a Hood Unit?
To me, I would take a cab unit over a low-nose hood unit because you have to be a contortionist to go to the bathroom on a low-nose unit. If it is a High Hood unit with a walk-in toilet, and the N&W/NS had some, there would be little difference.
Which Unit is easier when it comes to Maintenance and Servicing?
N/A
Cab Units require you to climb up the side ladders to reach the cab. Whereas on a Hood Unit, you walk up the steps to the front porch, unlock the nose door, open it, walk up a mini entry and your inside the locomotive.
Here is where we find out that you have never worked on the RR. For the most part the steps are the same. The exceptions were the GE units before the Dash-9. Before the Dash-9, the steps were like a ladder and it was no fun climbing. EMD always had good steps to climb. Why it took GE so long to realize this mistake (and there were others) is beyond me.
Some friends of mine told me they could climb up and down from a Cab Unit on a daily basis, while others said they'd injure themselves and might fall.
Climbing up is no problem. The correct way to come down is BACKWARDS and that is a Safety Rule!
I think Hood Units are easier to enter than Cab Units, but since the locomotives always rotate every day, you'll never know what you'll get next.
How would you know? Actually, on Cab Units it depends a lot on which side to try to mount. Pick the correct side and it's a piece of cake!
I was told that the FRA allowed "0" leakage on the Equalizing Reservoir. So, if it leaks, it's a defect. You need to call the roundhouse.
And, just to make things clear, what I have been speaking of is 26L brake with the pneumatic gauges. Since they are "duplex" gauges, each gauge has two knurled knobs that unscrew. The O-ring is on the end of the knob. It's this O-ring that may be bad and causing the leak. If you unscrew it, the only thing that happens is that the gauge needle goes to zero until you screw the knob back in.
I agree completely about graduated release, gotta make sure to never bump the handle! Anytime this topic comes up for discussion at work that hazard is mentioned.
The only times we end up running with it in passenger mode are if the failure occurs enroute, and I have heard the MSREP (Diesel Doc) suggesting the change on several occasions when the problem is reported to them.
I would have to look more closely at our rulebook, but I do not believe a lead unit is allowed to depart the location where the train originates without the automatic working properly in freight mode. Of course, if the leaking off is slow enough it may not be noticed during the shop track brake test of the locomotive consist.
Greetings from Alberta
-an Articulate Malcontent
The problem that I see with changing from "Freight" to "Pass" is that "Pass" is graduated. If you happen to move the brake handle in any way toward the release position it will put air into the BP and release the brakes. I have been on quite a few locos that had that feature. I even tried it out one day in the terminal while waiting to make a brake test and that is exactly what happened, moving the handle back (not all the way to release) graduated the air in the BP and knocked the brakes off. I would suggest you stay away from that practice. Then again, I haven't been on your units, so, what do I know?
BigJim I had never had any kind of problem with the maintaining feature, ever. However, there were quite a number of times that I had a problem with the equalizing reservoir leaking down on the 26L system. If you are on a district where you will need to use the air to maintain control of the train, you know how frustrating it is to set up the brake perfectly only to have it leak down on you and messing with your set up.
I had never had any kind of problem with the maintaining feature, ever. However, there were quite a number of times that I had a problem with the equalizing reservoir leaking down on the 26L system. If you are on a district where you will need to use the air to maintain control of the train, you know how frustrating it is to set up the brake perfectly only to have it leak down on you and messing with your set up.
That sounds exactly like the problem I was thinking of. Everyone at work has always referred to anything like that as "failing to pressure-maintain properly", sounds like that is not the right name for it.
Today no one fixes stuff like that themselves, if you did it wrong you would get hauled in for tampering with the unit.
Changing the automatic from freight to passenger mode has fixed the problem in most cases I have experienced, but it seems like only CN's units give you that option. The ex-Oakway SD60's and leased units I have been on do not have a passenger mode option, the automatic is simply cut in or out.
I do like the tearddrop windshields. Beats the rectangular ones the newer ones have with that awful glare.
still don't understand why we can't have real electric wipers, though.
The WABCO brakes like the 60-80ms had are pretty nice. Big ol' service zone so you get exactly what you want.
SD70DudeAnd when the pressure-maintaining feature fails (a regular occurrence now) just change it from freight to passenger mode.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.