I have asked Amtrak workers and I get F40PH (although they do say the cab on the Genesis is more comfortable.) Also a 2 stroke engine has more advantages to a 4 stroke. The fuel tank is a easy fix as CSX has proven. The notch 8 part is true but the F40 can cut out cylinders also updating it with a 2ed engine or an alternator in the nose would work to fix this.
well, you know what Jay Leno once said
"Amtrak gets more air than jetblue!"
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
Ham549 wrote:It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks.
It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks.
Ham549 wrote:It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks...
It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks...
Amtrak unloaded their F40PH's because they were old (at least 20 years old and up) and worn out. Most of the remaining F40PH's are in suburban service, which is less demanding, and a fair number of those have been rebuilt.
It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks. I have noticed that they tend to catch fire more often then not, there "seamless" design makes them a pain to work on they can't accelerate like a F40 could, and the list goes on and on. So why is it that the F40's are being scraped and tax payers $$$ being wasted on these POS?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.