Trains.com

F40PH vs Genesis

20952 views
126 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Saturday, January 26, 2008 8:16 PM
Alot of the Frames were also warped and starting to rust.  Also remember this when they retired the F40 the lowest mileage one had 2.4 Million miles on it.  You can only rebuild traction motors so many times before they do become unreliable also the Prime Movers the 645's were SHOT you run 2.4 million or more miles at full throttle max HP and also have start and stop then acclearate a train fast.  Face it they are fuel hogs and were worn out.  I know of one time were the Southwest Chief left Alberquere with 4 F40's on the point to climb Raton pass normally it took 2 they had to call the Santa Fe for an engine to help them 3 of the 4 failed on the pass.  Why worn out and all of them exploded the Prime Mover.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 229 posts
Posted by Ham549 on Saturday, January 26, 2008 7:41 PM

I have asked Amtrak workers and I get F40PH (although they do say the cab on the Genesis is more comfortable.) Also a 2 stroke engine has more advantages to a 4 stroke. The fuel tank is a easy fix as CSX has proven. The notch 8 part is true but the F40 can cut out cylinders also updating it with a 2ed engine or an alternator in the nose would work to fix this. 

Save the F40PH!
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Saturday, January 26, 2008 7:02 PM

well, you know what Jay Leno once said

"Amtrak gets more air than jetblue!"

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Canada
  • 509 posts
Posted by cprted on Saturday, January 26, 2008 5:57 PM
 Ham549 wrote:

It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks.

I didn't know they could fly!!!! Surely Amtrak has no excuse for late arrivals now.
The grey box represents what the world would look like without the arts. Don't Torch The Arts--Culture Matters http://www.allianceforarts.com/
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:36 PM
 Ham549 wrote:

It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks...



Who are the "many people"? Railfans who have never worked a day in the industry? Just asked the typical Amtrak engineer what they would prefer to operate and spend a workday in, and you will get a vastly different response.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Saturday, January 26, 2008 8:47 AM
Lets see here F40 required the engine to run in Notch 8 to provide HEP to the train only has 3000 hp when not providing HEP 2200 when in HEP and only has 1800 gallons of fuel.  Genesis series HEP is in notch 5 saving fuel 4000HP in the first ones 4200 in the second set 3600HP when producing HEP carries 2400 gallons of fuel.  Ge also desigened to fit into the Hudson river tunnels and be capable of running on 3rd rail the P32ACDM to replace the FL-9.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,493 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:47 AM

Amtrak unloaded their F40PH's because they were old (at least 20 years old and up) and worn out.  Most of the remaining F40PH's are in suburban service, which is less demanding, and a fair number of those have been rebuilt.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 229 posts
F40PH vs Genesis
Posted by Ham549 on Friday, January 25, 2008 8:19 PM

It seems that many people share the view that the F40PH was not only better then the Genesis but the Genesis just plane sucks. I have noticed that they tend to catch fire more often then not, there "seamless" design makes them a pain to work on they can't accelerate like a F40 could, and the list goes on and on. So why is it that the F40's are being scraped and tax payers $$$ being wasted on these POS?  

Save the F40PH!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy