This is pretty cool! I don't know a lot about locomotives but, I do like to find something old and/or something new and take lots of photographs. I am very new to the "hobby" though. I didn't know until a few weeks ago that so many people were into trains, both models and real life, as a hobby. I went with my brother to "The Greatest Hobby" train show when it was in Fort Worth, TX a few weeks ago and was amazed by all the stuff and really neat people. Since then I have been fortunate enough to have the time to "chase" trains all around the Dallas/Ft Worth area and take a few photos. I even made a business trip to the Texas gulf coast area and took 2 extra days coming home to chase a few trains and check out a few museums. I have met some really nice and very knowledgeable people. I just found this forum a couple of weeks ago and found some great people. Believe it or not, I have learned a few things and gathered some interesting information. Thanks to whoever is responsible for this forum.
Joel
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
Lord Atmo wrote:locomotives mean the most to me as a railfan
I think I'd pretty much say the same.
Lord Atmo wrote:as far as i'm concerned, CNW trash 9s aren't CNW locomotives. they dont have the CNW look and they didnt last long on CNW's fleet anyway. not to mention they're hopelessly ugly. they're also ruining any chance of getting a spartan cab CNW restored to a museum if either of them get donated. and since 5371 will be, it seems apparent to me that those 2 also will. only further dooming my hopes for an SD40-2 to get donated. therefore i want both of them destroyed
Um, it will be a LONG time before the UP is ready to donate any of the Dash 9s. And whatever paint the Dash 9's are wearing while in service with the UP will have zero effect on the disposition of UP's, ex CNW units.
Bert
An "expensive model collector"
All of the Locomotive related posts could be transferred to the Locomotives category.
How much time and effort are required to sort those posts and move them?
Andrew
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
Perhaps you should buy an SD40-2 yourself when UP sells them off in the next few years as EPA regs eliminate them from the fleet and repaint it CNW. I'm sure if they are selling them anyhow you could find one pretty cheap. Probably scrap value. If you aren't too particular you could probably get a shell for display purposes. Maybe you could even work with a Historical Society or museum to accomplish it. Any thing is possible if you put your mind to it. Look at the guy who got an Amtrak F40PH and preserved it.
If you quit crying and start working you'll be amazed what you can accomplish.
LC
Limitedclear wrote: Lord Atmo wrote:as far as i'm concerned, CNW trash 9s aren't CNW locomotives. they dont have the CNW look and they didnt last long on CNW's fleet anyway. not to mention they're hopelessly ugly. they're also ruining any chance of getting a spartan cab CNW restored to a museum if either of them get donated. and since 5371 will be, it seems apparent to me that those 2 also will. only further dooming my hopes for an SD40-2 to get donated. therefore i want both of them destroyedPerhaps you should buy an SD40-2 yourself when UP sells them off in the next few years as EPA regs eliminate them from the fleet and repaint it CNW. I'm sure if they are selling them anyhow you could find one pretty cheap. Probably scrap value. If you aren't too particular you could probably get a shell for display purposes. Maybe you could even work with a Historical Society or museum to accomplish it. Any thing is possible if you put your mind to it. Look at the guy who got an Amtrak F40PH and preserved it.If you quit crying and start working you'll be amazed what you can accomplish.LC
Chriss also has a Maersk painted SDP40
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
i'd love to, if i have the money. then there's the matter of where i'd keep it. my backyard? and even then, i would wonder how it would get over there in the first place
believe me when i say i'm broke. i can't even afford a subscription to the magazine... most people see that fee as "a couple bucks", but it looks like a fortune to me. that's just an idea of my bad money
eolafan wrote: Lord Atmo wrote:locomotives mean the most to me as a railfan
am i showing my age when i say.......what about the caboose????......and for that matter the endless stream of railcars with 100's of names from faraway places???.....oh wait 21st century...........7 railroads and 2 locomotive makers.........and FRED.........
Limitedclear wrote: .......................Perhaps you should buy an SD40-2 yourself when UP sells them off in the next few years as EPA regs eliminate them from the fleet .........LC
.......................Perhaps you should buy an SD40-2 yourself when UP sells them off in the next few years as EPA regs eliminate them from the fleet .........
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
Murphy Siding wrote: Limitedclear wrote: .......................Perhaps you should buy an SD40-2 yourself when UP sells them off in the next few years as EPA regs eliminate them from the fleet .........LC LC: are there EPA regs now, that will eliminate some existing locomotives in the future, or you picturing some future EPA ruling?
There seems to be a lot of confusion regarding these EPA regs so let's see if I can help a bit...those regulations only apply to new and rebuilt (not overhauled) units. Older units are grandfathered and are still going to be perfectly viable for quite some time. As you may have seen here or in trains mag, UP and presumably BNSF and other's are experimenting with retrofits to meet new standards for rebuilding units to meet the new standards, also both builders and aftermarket suppliers have or are in the process of designing retrofit kits to meet the new standards. The SD40 still has life in it! Also there are waivers available to smaller lines which lack the resources of the big boys to upgrade at a whim.
J. Edgar wrote:...what about the caboose????...
Dan
JT22CW wrote:WADR, it's kinda redundant in a forum called "Locomotives", perhaps? Lord Atmo wrote:locomotives mean the most to me as a railfanLocomotives make the RR lose money. It's what's behind the locomotives that makes the money for the RR. RR loses money, they misbehave towards their labor force and run fewer trains, and you get to see fewer locos. Perhaps that can help round out the railfan perspective...?
?
For me the best part of chasing trains, is the fun of hanging out with the guys, and putting on a pot of hobo beans, whenever we meet.
Hobo beans 2 cans of Bush's baked beans, 2 1 lb packages of Hebrew National, or Black Angus hot dogs, 1 small onion minced, 1 medium green pepper chopped small, a little bit of course ground black pepper. Cot the dogs into 3/4 inch long pieces, throw it all into a big pot, heat and eat, don't forget coffee. R Staller
J. Edgar wrote: Lord Atmo wrote:locomotives mean the most to me as a railfan am i showing my age when i say.......what about the caboose????......and for that matter the endless stream of railcars with 100's of names from faraway places???.....oh wait 21st century...........7 railroads and 2 locomotive makers.........and FRED.........
Y6bs evergreen in my mind
lol...well yes and no......
this is 1 pic from 91 in Lima......NKP 765 and PM 1225 doubleheaded from Lima to Huntington....while in Lima the engines did some switching....upon departure i stood right over the engines on the overpass........that was a mistake...cinders...soot....wetness.....and 1 great big smile........and i got the hint droppin....lol....i was born 7 years after mainline steam had vanished
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.