Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Overmod"]The aftertreatment Peter describes packages relatively neatly in existing locomotives (I believe he can even provide pictures or diagrams that show this). [/quote] The EMD E23 uses SCR to get Tier 4 marine compliant (1.33 g/bhp-hr NOx, 0,011 g/bhp-hr, approximately Tier 4 locomotive) <a href="http://s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/CM20170712-52832-51137">http://s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/CM20170712-52832-51137</a> What was the "inequity" for EMD? That they weren't able to sell Tier 4 locomotive for a few years while GE did? I would call this the consequences from a wrong business decision. Both companies had the same chance. GE decided early on that the FDL had not enough potential left. I don't see any unfairniss against EMD. The Carb even tested a Tier 2 EMD locomotive (UP9900) with aftertreatment for Tier 4 compliance. But I'm neither a EMD or GE fan. Regards, Volker
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag