Apparently CN has picked up some former CREX ES44s. Anyone know the details?
Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak
Was talked about on Loconotes. They're acquiring 75 CREX ES44AC's with 25 arriving this year and 50 more next year.
Will presumably do in the last of the Dash 8 fleet (And perhaps lead to some of the ex Oakway SD60's being retired; To the best of my knowledge CNR hasn't invested in rebuilds for these, so they must be starting to get pretty tired at this point).
Leo_AmesWas talked about on Loconotes. They're acquiring 75 CREX ES44AC's with 25 arriving this year and 50 more next year.
Quite a few of the ex-Oakway SD60s received work at NRE in the not too distant past (judging by stickers in the cabs) and most if not all are equipped with PTC. A few have also been equipped for beltpack/RCO operation. They haven't been regular mainline power for several years but have remained active in yard and local switching service, and I expect them to remain in these roles for quite some time.
Most of our Dash-8s are now in storage, including all the remaining cowls. Very few of them have been equipped with PTC, and while they might get resurrected this winter if traffic surges again I expect they will be disposed of in the not too distant future.
Photos are circulating on various Facebook groups of patched CREX ES44ACs renumbered into the CN 3900 series. 3912 was previously the highest numbered CN ES44AC so the additional units should end up being 3913 to 3987.
The CREX 1500s performed very well and were quite popular with crews when they were leased to CN a few years ago. At that time they did not have PTC but were equipped with pass-through ECP cables. Initially they were not fitted with all the Canadian cab ammenites but microwaves and hot plates were installed in short order. I preferred to have them leading because they had better seats than our units.
Here is a breakdown of the first 25 from Loconotes:
Greetings from Alberta
-an Articulate Malcontent
Word is CN was also testing NS DC-to-AC rebuilds, AC44C6CMs. What's up with that?
D.Carleton Word is CN was also testing NS DC-to-AC rebuilds, AC44C6CMs. What's up with that?
I just heard that rumour the other day too, but I haven't seen any photos or other confirmation yet. You have to be careful with information from Canadian Railway Observations, while they do often end up publishing good information their editor has a not undeserved reputation for repeating railfan and employee gossip as fact.
There is also a persistent rumour that they are going to send some SD70Is or 75Is to get rebuilt into ACs, but so far nothing has happened. Again, it was CRO that has been pushing this story for quite some time.
We do have over 200 Dash-9s still in regular mainline service. Nearly all have been equipped with PTC, which is an indication that the company intends to keep them around. They are getting quite old and tired by now, many are not equipped with DP, and IMO have not aged nearly as well as our 70 series EMDs. They are also the slowest to respond to the throttle, even worse than a Dash-8, which makes them far less than ideal for switching service.
This is just speculation, but IF the AC44 testing story is true and IF it proves successful I would not be surprised to see our Dash-9s become fodder for a rebuild program.
SD70Dude D.Carleton Word is CN was also testing NS DC-to-AC rebuilds, AC44C6CMs. What's up with that? I just heard that rumour the other day too, but I haven't seen any photos or other confirmation yet. You have to be careful with information from Canadian Railway Observations, while they do often end up publishing good information their editor has a not undeserved reputation for repeating railfan and employee gossip as fact. There is also a persistent rumour that they are going to send some SD70Is or 75Is to get rebuilt into ACs, but so far nothing has happened. Again, it was CRO that has been pushing this story for quite some time. We do have over 200 Dash-9s still in regular mainline service. Nearly all have been equipped with PTC, which is an indication that the company intends to keep them around. They are getting quite old and tired by now, many are not equipped with DP, and IMO have not aged nearly as well as our 70 series EMDs. They are also the slowest to respond to the throttle, even worse than a Dash-8, which makes them far less than ideal for switching service. This is just speculation, but IF the AC44 testing story is true and IF it proves successful I would not be surprised to see our Dash-9s become fodder for a rebuild program.
Speaking of the 75's. The 5700's were pretty popular with crews over here on the eastside of CN's system. I have seen a few in local service as of recent.
SD60MAC9500 Speaking of the 75's. The 5700's were pretty popular with crews over here on the eastside of CN's system. I have seen a few in local service as of recent.
They are very, very quiet inside. The original version of the WhisperCab is definitely the best, with the engine idling you can't tell that it's running from inside the cab, and at full throttle you can have a conversation without shouting. They are rather loud in dynamic braking as the fan is right behind the cab.
While not as quick to load as a SD40 or a blower EMD of any kind, they are still quick to respond to the throttle. And they have the best rear visibility of any of our high horsepower units. They also have a very large desk on the conductor's side, perfect for all the paperwork you get on a switching job.
They were not built with air conditioning or strip heaters, but some have been retrofitted with these features.
They can be slippery when on wet rail, but in my experience do not drop their load the way DC GEs tend to (GEs give up, a 5700 will sit there and spin all day if you let it). A bit of independent, lots of sand and throttling down a notch or two at low speeds gets the best out of them.
They are my favourite units to operate.
SD70Dude SD60MAC9500 Speaking of the 75's. The 5700's were pretty popular with crews over here on the eastside of CN's system. I have seen a few in local service as of recent. They can be slippery when on wet rail, but in my experience do not drop their load the way DC GEs tend to (GEs give up, a 5700 will sit there and spin all day if you let it). A bit of independent, lots of sand and throttling down a notch or two at low speeds gets the best out of them. They are my favourite units to operate.
They do seem to get down and pull pretty good. I have seen it first hand. Up in Port Huron where the Paul M Tellier Tunnel resides. Both the American and Canadian side of the grade is pretty steep at 2%. One night a single 5700 was handling a westbound from Oshawa, ON. I think the symbol was 275. I don't think this train runs anymore. Anyway with about 60 loaded autoracks trailing he was down to a crawl coming up the grade. The hogger that night was very skilled as he got that train into the yard at Port Huron.
Seeing more of the older BNSF units getting CREX patches on the webcams lately. Next step may be some red paint.
Two NS AC4400C6M locomotives are testing in Minnesota Iron Ore service out of Duluth, MN.
SD70Dude D.Carleton Word is CN was also testing NS DC-to-AC rebuilds, AC44C6CMs. What's up with that? I just heard that rumour the other day too, but I haven't seen any photos or other confirmation yet.
I just heard that rumour the other day too, but I haven't seen any photos or other confirmation yet.
D.Carleton SD70Dude D.Carleton Word is CN was also testing NS DC-to-AC rebuilds, AC44C6CMs. What's up with that? I just heard that rumour the other day too, but I haven't seen any photos or other confirmation yet. That is what this purports to be: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/773138/
That is what this purports to be: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/773138/
Thanks! I hadn't had a chance to go looking yet.
The ex-DMIR ore lines have been a stronghold of older power for years, Dash-8s started to replace SD40s fairly recently.
While I'm not from the area, photos usually seem to show the ore trains with at least three DC units. Replacing three C40-8's with two AC units (as in that photo) would be a big saving if it turns out to be practicable.
Not encouraging to see those long lines of boxcars in the background, presumably in storage.
CN has apparently purchased the remainder of the CREX ES44AC fleet, to be numbered CN 2750-2796.
CN now owns the entire Citirail ES44AC fleet, save for two that were previously sold to a mining railway in west Africa (Liberia-Gabon) and a third that was scrapped after being in a wreck.
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=5182993
SD70DudeCN has apparently purchased the remainder of the CREX ES44AC fleet, to be numbered CN 2750-2796. CN now owns the entire Citirail ES44AC fleet, save for two that were previously sold to a mining railway in west Africa (Liberia-Gabon) and a third that was scrapped after being in a wreck. http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=5182993
Used is cheaper than new. PSR!
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
I regularly see neatly-cab-patched Citirail units go through here on the ex-IC freight line. Interestingly, perhaps, I have yet to see one leading.
I have seen NS-painted power on a couple of trains, but didn't think to look at the cab numbering... will be more carefully attentive now.
They're actually really good units. I like having them leading since they don't have inward-facing cameras (yet) and I like their seats better than those on our units. Many of them don't have PTC yet, but I'm sure they'll all be equipped for it eventually.
Several of our Dash-9s have been sent to the GE/Wabtec Fort Worth plant, but I haven't heard what is to happen with them.
Now it's NS' turn as NSDash9 is reporting they are acquiring a bunch of CIT AC4400s.
Now the only big Class 1 of the past 25 years not to operate AC4400CW's is Canadian National.
I'm curious to know if these have been refreshed by GE/Wabtec or still original equipment.
Are these part of the 200+ units BNSF returned?
No, these were leased to CP for fifteen years from new and since then have been on various short term leases
Probably from one or both of these batches:
CEFX 1001-1025 - 25 units built to UP specifications
CEFX 1026-1059 - 34 units built to CP specifications
https://www.thedieselshop.us/CEFX.HTML
Perhaps these units:
https://www.railpictures.net/photo/827730/
kgbw49 Perhaps these units: https://www.railpictures.net/photo/827730/
Yes, fresh paint and a pine tree air freshener in every cab thrown in at no charge!
Those are CEFX units that used to be leased to CP - they have the numbers in that series of the former long-term leasers to CP.
Perhaps they will be run through the AC44C6M program.
They're not Dash 9's.
Being that they're AC4400CW's, I imagine if NS ever does rebuild them, GE/Wabtec will get the job and they'll be rebuilt along the same lines that CSX (CM44AC or if it's a heavy, CM44AH), CPR (AC4400CWM), and UP (C44ACM) have been doing with their own AC4400CW's.
Being that it's not going to be a huge fleet like the NS Dash 9 to AC project has been, I doubt we'd see Altoona do any. It would likely happen at Erie or Ft. Worth where they're already setup and experienced with the factory AC4400CW modernization program for these other roads.
That said, I'm sure there's even more commonality between a modernized AC4400CW and a AC44C6M than there was originally when the latter were Dash 9's. A lot of the work, processes, and components are presumably similar or identical, like the AC traction control system going into both.
Thank you, Leo_Ames! That makes a lot of sense.
That's why I'm wondering if they were already upgraded by CIT before the sale. Probably not. As NS never had AC44s they won't have original inverter parts on the shelf. This should make things interesting for the folks in inventory.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.