Trains.com

Amtrak's ACS64

5344 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 9 posts
Amtrak's ACS64
Posted by richardtrains219 on Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:43 AM
I was on the platform at 30 St. Station in Philadelphia waiting for the train to D.C. where I saw it for the first time. I love it.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,013 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 23, 2014 10:24 AM

GLAD YOU LIKE THE DESIGN AND THAT AMTRAK HAS DONE SOMETHING RIGHT

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,813 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:34 AM

More specifically, Siemens did something right. I got to tour the factory before the first one was released so I saw it being constructed. Very cool to watch them transform a light rail facility into a mainline loco facility. Waiting for a Chance to see them building Diesel Electrics.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,473 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:36 AM
Maybe it looks better in person then pictures show. There was a reason the PRR moved the P5 and GG1 cabs to the center of the engine. That cab location would make me nervous if I was the engineer traveling at corridor speeds.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:56 PM

There used to be grade crossings on the corridor, now there are none. The reason the cabs were moved on later P5s and GG1s were the result of a bad grade crossing accident with an early P5. All the AEM7 and E60 locomotives had their cabs at the front. The ACS-64 locomotives are probably constructed like their German counterparts wherein the cab is solidly built but the body behind the cab is designed to crumple in the event of a collision, so the cab remains intact and with minimal  deformation. If the collision is that severe the crew will suffer their injuries from colliding with the walls of the cab, since they don't wear full safety harnesses and have air bags.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,473 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:18 AM
Well intercity kids have been known to do things like dropping rocks as trains go by. E60s had grates put over the front windows. Then there is the Gunpow incident where the CR engineer was high on pot and pulled onto the main in fro nt of Amtrak. He survived. The AEM7 crew did not and these windows are much bigger. It is a very dangerous location regardless of break zones.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Sunday, September 28, 2014 6:29 PM

there are stil about 3 grade crossings on NEC all in Connecticut I believe but all in relatively slow speed area's

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,924 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:55 PM

ndbprr
Well intercity kids have been known to do things like dropping rocks as trains go by. E60s had grates put over the front windows. Then there is the Gunpow incident where the CR engineer was high on pot and pulled onto the main in fro nt of Amtrak. He survived. The AEM7 crew did not and these windows are much bigger. It is a very dangerous location regardless of break zones.

Rock dropping is not limited to intercity kids - country boys know the trick too.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

Moderator
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 1,532 posts
Posted by Brian Schmidt on Thursday, October 2, 2014 1:41 PM

There will be a feature story on the new Siemens ACS-64 locomotives in the January 2015 issue of Trains.

Brian Schmidt, Editor, Classic Trains magazine

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:28 PM

Interesting that these locomotives are now being used on the Keystone Corridor:

http://www.progressiverailroading.com/amtrak/news/New-Amtrak-locomotive-debuts-on-Keystone-route--42338?

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 4 posts
Posted by Jay1 on Monday, May 18, 2015 5:27 PM

The AEM-7's were "Toasters" or "Swedish Meatballs", HHP's were "Bananas" or "Rhinos", we still need nicknames for the ACS engines!  I suggest "Frankfurters" and\or "Bratwursts"!

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:12 PM

Jay1

The AEM-7's were "Toasters" or "Swedish Meatballs", HHP's were "Bananas" or "Rhinos", we still need nicknames for the ACS engines!  I suggest "Frankfurters" and\or "Bratwursts"!

"Catwomen".

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,476 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Wednesday, May 20, 2015 5:19 PM

How about "Krautmobiles"?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,474 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:41 AM

caldreamer

How about "Krautmobiles"?

A variation on that term was already used to refer to the Krauss-Maffei diesel-torque converter locomotives on Rio Grande and Southern Pacific.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, May 21, 2015 7:48 AM

Nah, they've already been nicknamed "Sprinters".

  • Member since
    April 2011
  • 649 posts
Posted by LensCapOn on Friday, May 22, 2015 8:53 AM

NorthWest

Nah, they've already been nicknamed "Sprinters".

 

The Air Force brass called the Warthog the "Thunderbolt II".

We'll see how long Sprinter lasts.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, May 22, 2015 8:50 PM

A nickname needs to be short and memorable. Sprinter meets both criteria, and has apparently been adopted by crew members.

FWIW, the nickname for the HHP-8 was not 'rhino' but 'hippo'. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, May 23, 2015 4:42 AM

NorthWest

FWIW, the nickname for the HHP-8 was not 'rhino' but 'hippo'. 

 
Owing to the lack of a nose horn, no doubt...
 
M636C
  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:09 AM

M636C
Owing to the lack of a nose horn, no doubt...

Pretty good!  But I think more likely it's a different phonetic spelling:  "HHPo"...

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,288 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:51 AM

   A locomotive without a horn?

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, May 23, 2015 12:32 PM

Paul of Covington
A locomotive without a horn?

No, that's not at ALL what he said -- remember that M636C comes from a land where 'nose horn' actually means something:

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 54 posts
Posted by groomer man on Friday, August 7, 2015 4:37 AM
Not politically correct

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy