Trains.com

California Zephyr & other current consists?

3205 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 178 posts
California Zephyr & other current consists?
Posted by erosebud on Saturday, April 2, 2011 1:40 PM

This shouldn't be hard, but I've spent over an hour searching fruitlessly for an answer:  How can I find a list of the equipment in current use on the California Zephyr, Coast Starlight, and Empire Builder?  I'm more a freelance steam modeler, so I don't have the right instincts, I guess, but I'll be riding these trains in a few months and am curious to know their rosters, particularly the motive power.  Any links would be appreciated, or if you know off the top of your head, just tell me.  Thanks.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, April 2, 2011 6:44 PM

As far as I know, all these trains would have at least two GE P42s as motive power, sometimes a third (and maybe a rebuilt P40 in there somewhere).

The trains themselves are made up of Superliner two level cars, with from the front, a number of coaches, a diner, a lounge and a number of sleepers. There would most likely at least one single level baggage car leading. The Coast Starlight has (or has had recently) an additional special lounge car.

M636C

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 120 posts
Posted by bartman-tn on Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:31 AM

Last week when I rode, #5 was 2 locos, baggage car, dorm/sleeper, 3 coach, lounge, diner, 2 sleepers.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 389 posts
Posted by corwinda on Thursday, April 7, 2011 4:50 PM

Yes the Coast Starlight has a second lounge car; the Pacific parlour for sleeping car passengers.

 

As for power; the Starlight usually has 2 P42s; but I have seen an occasional P32 or F59.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 1 posts
Posted by Bandersnatch on Saturday, May 7, 2011 8:27 AM

The Empire Builder consist is a little complicated because it splits at Spokane, with half the train going over the Cascade range to Seattle, and the other half going down the Columbia River Gorge to Portland.  The consist varies seasonally, but generally runs something like:

Seattle to Spokane: 2 engines, 1 Baggage, 1 Dorm/Sleeper, 2 Sleeper, 1 Diner, 2-3 Coach

Portland to Spokane: 1 engine, 1 Lounge, 1 Coach/Baggage, 1 Coach, 1 Sleeper

At Spokane, the Portland consist is added to the back of the Seattle consist, and the engine is put up front.

Also, during peak seasons, a single coach is added between Chicago and St. Paul (Train 807/808).  The westbound Empire Builder leaves it at the platform to be picked up by the eastbound EB to return to Chicago.

I've ridden the Empire Builder just once, so I know some of the details from experience, but I got most of the info by looking up Empire Builder on Wikipedia.  Most Amtrak trains have their own article, including some of the discontinued routes like the Pioneer and the Desert Wind.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Seattle
  • 36 posts
Posted by rrbrewer on Saturday, July 9, 2011 2:58 PM

Re the Coast Starlight as of July 2011, it has two P42s [sometimes another power unit is substituted], baggage car, transitional sleeper, three sleepers, parlor lounge car for the sleeper passengers, diner, sightseer lounge car, and four coaches.

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:41 AM

With the Empire Builder only running a relatively small portion of its eastern and western ends, Amtrak should temporarily be in a surplus position regarding Superliners.  Does anyone know if they took advantage of this condition to add cars to either the Zephyr or other trains?

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,034 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, July 10, 2011 4:30 AM

A friend who sometimes does visit this forum reported on a trip from Tcoma back to Croton Harmon, NY,.   He had resvs on the EB, but Amtrak diverted him to coach to Sacramento on the Starlight and then the CZ (sole occupier of a bedroom) to Chicago and the day-later LS to CH.   The answer seems to be yes, with a qualification.   The amount extra equipment is limited by the fact that the CZ cannot make its schedule despite the best attempts of the dispatchers, because of the extremely heavy freight traffic caused by the BNSF diversions, including the bypassing of Omaha.  He reported that during daylight, east of Denver, every siding he saw had a freight or two in it.  Arrival in Chicago was 14 hours late, with hotel paid by Amtrak, and space in the Boston sleeper (2 days late from original plan), change to coach in A-R. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy