Trains.com

Crandall Cab E8 and Australian Bulldogs

12279 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Crandall Cab E8 and Australian Bulldogs
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, January 11, 2009 12:41 AM

As everyone knows, in the 1970s C&NW rebuilt several ex-UP E8Bs with the unimaginative Crandall Cab.  EMD stopped building bulldog noses with their last E9A in 1963.  The Aussies, however, continued to build bulldog nose EMDs into the 1970s.  The Clyde AT26C, essentially a cabbody SD40, had the classic EMD bulldog nose.  Now, which one looks better, a plain-unstylish Crandall cab welded to an E-unit, or a classic bulldog on a F45-style body? Maybe C&NW should have outshopped their cab construction to the Aussies!

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Troy, AL
  • 724 posts
Posted by BamaCSX83 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 9:17 AM

I'd have to go with the later over the former.  The bulldog nose looks 10000000000000% better than the Crandall cab.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Sunday, January 11, 2009 12:56 PM

That Crandall cab has a face only a mother could love Shock

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Monday, January 12, 2009 11:35 AM

No question that the Crandall cab locos were plug ugly but they were designed to reuse older units in an efficient manner and, from what I've read, gave good service in the commuter operation they were rebuilt for...

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Australia
  • 56 posts
Posted by GMS-AU on Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:09 AM
CNW could have gone to the trouble of finding and fitting old E and F unit noses', but being a private company running an unprofitable commuter service maybe went for the cheaper option. Even cheaper possibly is if they built a flat front on the carbody. The Australian railways that purchased the E shaped models were Government owned, and when spending, someone else's money, were happy to pay the price for a styled carbody. Being locally assembled also helps the local industry, always important to Government's. GMS-AU
There is no replacement for displacement!
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:29 PM

GMS-AU
Even cheaper possibly is if they built a flat front on the carbody.

 

Flat-faced locos aren’t popular here in the states due to crossing accidents and collisions.  Cab crews probably would have voiced safety concerns if C&NW tried a flat face like Rock Island’s AB6.

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:36 PM

I didn’t realize the Crandall had 3-pane windows until I looked closer at the photo.  Safety cabs in early SD60Ms and F59PH have 3-pane windows too. 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Boone Iowa
  • 520 posts
Posted by cnwfan51 on Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:52 AM

I will admit that these Cradell cabs were a plain jane but you need to remember that when the CNW did this they like most railroads in the 70s were strapped for cash. They were doing everything possible to keep from going under. It was about the same time that the CNW offered a buy in progran to thier employees and they were known as Employee Owned Just a thought Larry

larry ackerman
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:45 AM

And what kind of mother could do that to a child.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Sunday, January 25, 2009 10:38 AM

passengerfan

And what kind of mother could do that to a child.

Al - in - Stockton

LaughLaughLaugh

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,959 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:09 PM

Lyon_Wonder

As everyone knows, in the 1970s C&NW rebuilt several ex-UP E8Bs with the unimaginative Crandall Cab.  EMD stopped building bulldog noses with their last E9A in 1963.  The Aussies, however, continued to build bulldog nose EMDs into the 1970s.  The Clyde AT26C, essentially a cabbody SD40, had the classic EMD bulldog nose.  Now, which one looks better, a plain-unstylish Crandall cab welded to an E-unit, or a classic bulldog on a F45-style body? Maybe C&NW should have outshopped their cab construction to the Aussies!

  

 

The 'styling' of the Crandall cab locomotives was just a continuation of the 'styling' the CNW applied to the observation cars on the Twin Cities 400's

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 4:02 PM

carnej1

No question that the Crandall cab locos were plug ugly but they were designed to reuse older units in an efficient manner and, from what I've read, gave good service in the commuter operation they were rebuilt for...

Depends on what you mean by "good service".

They were incredibly slippery.

They did not seem to have as much power as a regular E8. 

They were extremely loud in the cab, especially the horn, due to no insulation (as these were former B units).

They were very cold and drafty for the same reasons.

The cab heaters were terrible and noisy.

The side windows were thin plexiglass, which rattled and flapped in the wind. After about a week after installation, the windows became so cloudy that it was nearly impossible to see out the side windows at night. This made finding one's spot at a station stop rather difficult.

The Cummins engines that were used for HEP sprayed oil all over the back of the engine room.

The ladder and side steps were too narrow to get a good toe-hold, especially during snow and ice season.

Due to the lousy design of the side windows, when the units were in push mode in the snow, the snow would get in the cab and cover everything. And because the heaters were so ineffective, this sometimes led to frozen controls.

On the plus side, the air brake system was the 26L, a much improvement over the 24RL of the E8's.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Sunday, February 7, 2010 1:10 PM

 Just out of curiosity what ever happened to these units?   I remember reading somewhere that one of the rebuilt E's frame was originally a City of San Francisco or City of Los Angeles B unit.(making it a very vintage frame)

Thx IGN

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 1:41 PM

narig01

 Just out of curiosity what ever happened to these units?   I remember reading somewhere that one of the rebuilt E's frame was originally a City of San Francisco or City of Los Angeles B unit.(making it a very vintage frame)

Thx IGN

I have no idea what happened to them. At the time, I just wanted them gone.

The only unit I knew what happened to it was Metra 511, which went on to become the UP 949.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy