Trains.com

Do/did ATSF's 8-40BWs have the same weight problems as the GP60Ms

2239 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,814 posts
Do/did ATSF's 8-40BWs have the same weight problems as the GP60Ms
Posted by YoHo1975 on Thursday, February 7, 2008 11:53 AM
Subject pretty much covers it, did the GE 4 axle units have the same weight problems? If they didn't then why didn't they?
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Thursday, February 7, 2008 1:26 PM
From calling a few sources of mine I have.  The B-40-8W had some minor issuse but they were solved by putting the Fuel tank back moving BOTH air tanks in front of the fuel tank and it could carry its full load of fuel. 
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Monday, February 11, 2008 11:53 AM
GE had less trouble balancing the Dash8-40BW, but they did manage to make a locomotive that rides worse than the GP60M, it is even heavier. So yes they had the same problems as EMD, you will notice that no one but Santa Fe ever ordered any.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, February 11, 2008 12:36 PM

The GE floating bolster truck is nobody's kidneys friend.  The Conrail B40-8s were 287,000#, so I imagine the W's were even heavier.

Actually, the somewhat lighter B36-7s rode worse than the B40s at speed due to their shorter length. 

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Monday, February 11, 2008 4:30 PM
Heck the ONLY RR's that have GE B truck Widecabs are the BNSF via the Santa Fe and Amtrak.  From what I can glean and from looking at my old 1994 ETT the B-40-8W weighed in at 290K right at the limit of what they could with full tanks.  Yes that FB-2 is a kidney buster but still rides better than the old AAR-B it replaced. 
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 1:31 PM

The AAR type B is a swinghanger truck with stiff primaries and soft secondaries ala the EMD swinghanger truck.  It SHOULD ride better than the FB.  I never did a head to head ride test of the two, though.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Spring, TX
  • 68 posts
Posted by Stevo3751 on Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:26 PM
I know the GP60M's were problematic but I would understand if the B40-8W's had problems, too. The safety cab feature was still new at the time of their building.
In Memory of Matthew P. Kveton Sr. (1909-1997) Former Santa Fe Railway Conductor
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 2,741 posts
Posted by Paul Milenkovic on Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:49 PM

I guess I think I know how a pedestal journal guided, drop equalizer, swing hanger truck works.  I think I sorta know how the Pioneer-III style Amfleet truck works -- Don Oltmann explained it is merely a rubber sandwich for the primary springs and those big air springs, allowing some side motion and tied against fore-aft motion with those carbody struts.

How does an FB (floating bolster) truck work?  Is it anything like the Amfleet truck?  And what is a Flexicoil, and how does that one work?

If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Friday, June 13, 2008 12:51 AM
IIRC, the wide nose cab made the GP60M's top heavy.  I wonder if EMD had put the GP60Ms on a longer frame, say 62', would have helped?
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,814 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:57 AM

Paul, if you go look through some of the other thread from around the time I made this one, a poster by the name bogie engineer (hmm, something tells me he knows things) explained some of the differences in these trucks.  

 Paul Milenkovic wrote:

I guess I think I know how a pedestal journal guided, drop equalizer, swing hanger truck works.  I think I sorta know how the Pioneer-III style Amfleet truck works -- Don Oltmann explained it is merely a rubber sandwich for the primary springs and those big air springs, allowing some side motion and tied against fore-aft motion with those carbody struts.

How does an FB (floating bolster) truck work?  Is it anything like the Amfleet truck?  And what is a Flexicoil, and how does that one work?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy