Trains.com

Traction engines

3791 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Traction engines
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:05 AM
I am building a model of a rod drive electric engine. Are the drivers quartered the same as on a steam locomotive, or does it really matter? The engine is being built at 1 1/2" to the foot scale and will be driven by an electric motor. On a steamer, quartering is necessary or the engine would not be able to self start, but on an electric, there is one power source.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:10 AM
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the rods would not be quartered since the drive source is rotating instead of reciprocating.  They may be 180 degrees from each other in order to lessen the counter-balancing that would still be needed.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:23 PM
Thanks for your reply. It's just what I thought too. It shouldn't be much different than a diesel or other electric.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: heart of the Pere Marquette
  • 847 posts
Posted by J. Edgar on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:41 PM

well heres my My 2 cents [2c].....this pic shows the rear drive set of a PRR DD1 quartered around 90 degrees....is ths typical?? dunno.....but you can see the counterweight of the rear drive shaft is off about 90 from one side to the other...i would assume the front set is the same....

 

i love the smell of coal smoke in the morning Photobucket
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, November 1, 2007 12:19 AM

The drivers are quartered and cross-balanced to minimize asymmetrical stress on the frame.  Quartering to balance piston thrust isn't necessary in a siderod electric, but the dynamic augment of reciprocating weight is still there.  And, if the rods were set at zero or 180 degree offset, the rods wouldn't be able to transmit rotary motion from the motor to the wheels.

Chuck

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 1, 2007 12:20 PM
Thank you all for the replies. I think my question has been answered. BTW, the DD-1 model is on the back burner. I am working on an electric (class D, 1-C-1) used on the SJ, a Swedish line that operates some very interesting engines. The reason is the class D was built with a wood body, hence easier for me to build. The DD-1 would be a steel body. Although I have the means to work either wood or metal, I prefer wood.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Sunday, November 4, 2007 8:17 PM

 tomikawaTT wrote:
the dynamic augment of reciprocating weight is still there[in a siderod electric]

What reciprocating weight? 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Sunday, November 4, 2007 8:24 PM

 DD1 wrote:
I think my question has been answered.

One guy answered yes, the other one answered no. Which one did you choose? 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 5, 2007 8:12 AM

I think the concensus indicates the drivers are quartered and that's what I'm going with. I will post pictures of the finished engine at a later date. For now, progress is slow as I have to reinvent the wheel as I go. Here is a foto of the engine I'm building.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, November 5, 2007 9:01 AM
 timz wrote:

 tomikawaTT wrote:
the dynamic augment of reciprocating weight is still there[in a siderod electric]

What reciprocating weight? 

Looking at one side of the locomotive only, the weight of the siderod and main rod cannot be fully counterbalanced (the main driver wheel weight can't be made big enough.)  The effect is more noticeable in the horizontal plane, and is offset either by having pilot wheels (as in the DD-1) or by having a longer rigid wheelbase.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Monday, November 5, 2007 4:40 PM

 tomikawaTT wrote:
the weight of the siderod and main rod cannot be fully counterbalanced (the main driver wheel weight can't be made big enough.)

You agree the counterweight could have been bigger than it was? (On the DD1, anyway.) So why didn't they make it bigger, if more was needed? We've all seen pics of semicircular counterweights.

And no reciprocating weight-- right?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy