Trains.com

Hey NS how about a heritage fleet like UP's

5781 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: USA
  • 161 posts
Hey NS how about a heritage fleet like UP's
Posted by rstaller on Monday, October 1, 2007 6:08 PM

  It would be nice to see a layout in Trains, on an NS heritage fleet, similat to the one on UP. Comments? 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 8:37 PM

What would the paint schemes look like?

Exact recreations of the schemes like on the Southern GP59?

Stylized graphics like the Union Pacific?

Andrew

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: Marceline Sub
  • 16 posts
Posted by RhyRhy on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 9:39 PM

Wouldn't the "new" F-unites be considered heritage fleet?

 

BNSF Needs to do this as well. Completely drop the BN and re-paint all units in the Warbonnet Evil [}:)]

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Tn
  • 22 posts
Posted by nsrayman on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:13 AM

 

CONRAIL heritage unit Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 6:37 AM
They don't have rights to any of the pre-Conrail schemes, so that would leave out PRR, NYC, LV, EL etc.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: USA
  • 161 posts
Posted by rstaller on Wednesday, October 3, 2007 11:24 AM
  I was referring to the likes of NW (maroon and gold, NKP, Southern (any green scheme) etc.  It would be interesting at any rate.  Randy
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
Posted by chicagorails on Friday, October 5, 2007 11:48 AM
 me thinks every class 1 rr should have hert. units. it would help image of rrs better. more respect of history too.Smile [:)]and more
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, October 5, 2007 12:11 PM

 chicagorails wrote:
 me thinks every class 1 rr should have hert. units. it would help image of rrs better. more respect of history too.Smile [:)]and more

Sounds good on paper but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for it to happen.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Joliet, IL
  • 1,646 posts
Posted by EJE818 on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 8:01 PM
Hey, they already have it 1/3 done with the 4610 so now all they need to do are Wabash and NW engines! Smile [:)]
Robby Gragg - EJ&E fan Railpictures photos: http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=5292 Flickr photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084206@N08/ Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EJE665 R-V videos: http://www.rail-videos.net/showvideos.php?userid=5292
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: USA
  • 161 posts
Posted by rstaller on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:59 PM
  I wanna see NKP on the sides of a brand new loco.  Randy
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: K&A Sub MP 415.0
  • 163 posts
Posted by K&ARailfan on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 5:39 PM
It won't happen, remeber that UP only did so to protect it's trademarks. Although, I'd love to see CSX do some. They still have alot of ex-Chessie, and Seaboard (and most of their other parent RR's) locomotives. Also that would back the "Diversity In Motion" slogan! Laugh [(-D]
The question of what CSX stands for comes up frequently on these forums, so here you go. C=Chessie S=Seaboard, X=Many More/The RR's that Chessie and Seaboard were comprised of (L&N, C&O, SCL, etc)
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 1,092 posts
Posted by oskar on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 6:04 PM

Most of those Chessies are in deadlines. With CSX's 9120-2 in Waycross who knows if they will be the last Chessie's to be on active roster. They still have a pumkin(CSX 9119) and a Seaboard (2667) and the SD40 4617 in C&O paint. Of course you could count the YN1 or YN2 that are in the modified paint schemes. You can also count the 3(?) Electro-Motive Demos and the GP60 Demo in LLPX paint(CSX 6899) which never really makes it out of the south.

 

 

Kevin

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:51 PM
NKP and Wabash would be cool, but N&W?  Even the blue with round herald was OK, but even the maroon version of the NW block letters is rather bland IMHO.  What' next? A PC hertigage unit?  How about an early Conrail patch of a PC unit?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: K&A Sub MP 415.0
  • 163 posts
Posted by K&ARailfan on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:55 PM
Actually, I meant any CSX painted ex-Chessie, Seaboard, etc.
The question of what CSX stands for comes up frequently on these forums, so here you go. C=Chessie S=Seaboard, X=Many More/The RR's that Chessie and Seaboard were comprised of (L&N, C&O, SCL, etc)
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 88 posts
Posted by f14aplusfl on Friday, October 12, 2007 10:03 AM

You can't beat a paint scheme like that... 

 

Well if we are going to go there... I'd like to see the FEC paint all their locomotives like the 1950s yellow, red, and gold. Smile [:)] I mean like wings looked good on UP F and E units and then on modern day safety cabs, I think the old FEC colors would look great. Personally the Alaska RRish colors on the latest SD70M-2s look awful in comparison.

Florida East Coast Railway - Flagler System "Speedway to America's Playground" Roads bad, Trains better.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Joliet, IL
  • 1,646 posts
Posted by EJE818 on Friday, October 12, 2007 10:12 PM
I think all of the class ones should celebrate their heritage. UP did a neat thing with the heritage engines, and even if it was for trademarks, which personally I don't think was the reason, it still provides us with SD70ACes painted in predecessor schemes, so hey, either way it is a win/win situation for us trackside!
Robby Gragg - EJ&E fan Railpictures photos: http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=5292 Flickr photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084206@N08/ Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EJE665 R-V videos: http://www.rail-videos.net/showvideos.php?userid=5292
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 319 posts
Posted by sanvtoman on Monday, October 15, 2007 1:38 PM

 

    One would think NS is to frugal i.e tight to do heritage locos. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy