Trains.com

NS units

3092 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Ontario
  • 737 posts
NS units
Posted by da_kraut on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 9:34 PM

Hello everybody

Why is it that the NS only orders 4000 hp road units when everybody else orders 4400 hp road units from GE?  Is it that the reliability of the diesel engines increases dramatically if they produce 400 hp less?

Thank you for your replies.

Frank

"If you need a helping hand, you'll find one at the end of your arm."

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 10 posts
Posted by cairosbd on Tuesday, August 7, 2007 10:08 PM
This is what I have heard:  Being the cost optimizing company that Norfolk Southern is, it buys the 4000hp units because of the greater fuel economy.  It doesn't have anything to do with reliability.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 1:58 AM
The NS units use the same prime mover as everybody else.  They feel that by using them at 4000 hp instead of 4300, or 4380, that the engines will run longer between overhauls.  Some have a switch that will allow use of the extra 400 hp.  Using something below its rated capacity usually increases the service life.

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 3:32 AM
If there is a simple switch that allows the crew to re-rate the engine to its original power, what is to prevent the NS's crews (or the crew of some other railroad) from defeating the purpose of the derating?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 3:51 AM
I think what the other person was saying is that back in the engine room, or something is s switch.  You are correct though, if there was a switch in the cab compartment then yes, it would be defeating the purpose.  But I would think it is in the engine comartment, and probably locked out and tagged by mechanical. 
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 7:28 AM
I think that there is a key that you have to have to make to swap over.

.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 2:21 PM

 BigJim wrote:
I think that there is a key that you have to have to make to swap over.

Yes , it resembles a diagonal wire cutter .

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 3:52 PM

I've had a couple of units that must have slipped by the person that derates them. I pulled up the Loco Monitor and the unit was indicating 4500 - 4600HP!

Sometimes I wonder just how accurate those readouts are. I have stopped waiting on a meet and let the unit auto shut down. I had the monitor on watching the temps on the water, oil and Traction Motors. We sat there for at least a couple of hours and the TM temp went down to about the ambient air temp. As soon as the unit started again and before loading, the TM temp was showing something way up there, like well over 150. The reading took a long time to come down. I asked an electrican about this and he said it was just a guess by the onboard computer in the offbeat way it monitors things like that.

.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 195 posts
Posted by NS SD70M-2 on Wednesday, August 8, 2007 4:08 PM
Because a large amount of the ns units are DC instead of AC?
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:14 PM
NS does things differently.  After all they had conventional cabs a long time (wish they had kept them) and are formed from two railroads that specialized in long hood forward.  And they do seem to prefer DC traction.  Can't argue with what works.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:45 PM

the spartan cab stuff was also because of costs. at the time of their introduction, safety cabs cost more. so NS stuck with spartan cabs. then after safety cabs became the only cab offered, the price was dropped to the same as the spartan cabs originally cost. hence NS went crazy with C40-9Ws.

although i never did understand why they weren't all over that safety cab design when it first came out. they were notorious for high hoods and running units backwards all for the sake of crew protection. so it would seem like this new design with collision posts is a godsend to that purpose 

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy