Trains.com

Largest Drivers

8075 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Northern Illinois
  • 130 posts
Largest Drivers
Posted by Trailryder on Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:39 PM

A lot of discussion has been about the largest, strongest, heaviest, most tractive effort.. Etc

But I have never heard what Locomotive has the largest drivers.

I have always heard that driver size roughly converts to speed in MPH so I would expect this record holding locomotive to be a Fast Passenger engine.

I am mostly interested in American Locomotives but I would also like to hear about Locomotives from any location.

Thanks

Later Bill

 

 

If You Don't know where your going, Any Road will Take you There.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 47 posts
Posted by jr 611 on Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:15 PM

 84 in drivers on the Santa Fe and Milwaukee road Hudsons   

please help the cb&q 5614
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Northview, Missouri
  • 409 posts
Posted by JamesP on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:15 AM

Well, in the USA I would vote for the Dripps 6-2-0 built for the Camden and Amboy, a Crampton type locomotive.  It had 96" drivers.  This was relatively early in locomotive development, in the 1840's.  Crampton's reasoning for the huge driver diameter was to reduce piston speed as opposed to producing an extreme high speed locomotive, although the Crampton's in England were said to run as fast as 75 mph... that's really rolling in the mid 1800's. 

Here are a couple of wikipedia links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6-2-0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crampton_locomotive

 - James

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:10 AM
How about 86" drivers on P&R P5 camelback Atlantics built in 1907 for Camden to Atlantic City service?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:57 AM

Just musing here, but I often wonder where the limit might have been if steam had had a longer run.  I guess the answer would not have been in more unsprung mass, which larger/heavier drivers would necessarily be, but a combination of such and bearings on drive mechanisms, etc. might have had steamers doing well in excess of 110 mph continuously.

I believe some of the Jubilee Class of CPR's stable, the 4-4-4's, had 82" drivers, and I thought I had read that one of those held the Canadian steam locomotive speed record somewhere near 110/112 mph....but I'm fuzzy on that.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:19 PM

As I recall in the late 1800s several classes of single-driving-axle engines in Great Britain had drivers over 8 feet-- I'll check.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:03 PM
Excessively large drivers were not needed for speed with a modern steam design. The N&W J could hit 110 mph with 70" drivers, and the C&O J3a can run all day at 100 mph and hit over 120 mph with 72" drivers.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:56 AM

Because of very intelligent counterblancing and relatively lightwieght rods

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:07 PM

Casserly's pocket book on British steam says somebody built a 10-ft driver engine in 1838, but it didn't last long. The Bristol and Exeter 4-2-4Ts of 1853 did last some years with their 9-ft drivers. (Which were flangeless, it says.)

 One problem with tall drivers on British engines with inside cylinders: the bottom of the boiler has to clear the inside cranks.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:33 PM

timz

Casserly's pocket book on British steam says somebody built a 10-ft driver engine in 1838, but it didn't last long. The Bristol and Exeter 4-2-4Ts of 1853 did last some years with their 9-ft drivers. (Which were flangeless, it says.)

 One problem with tall drivers on British engines with inside cylinders: the bottom of the boiler has to clear the inside cranks.

Here is one of those Bristol & Exeter high steppers, Broad gauge to boot!

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: FEC MP334
  • 961 posts
Posted by ZephyrOverland on Friday, August 20, 2010 11:10 AM

There was also a French engine, named L'Aigle, which was built in 1855 and had 9' 4" diameter wheels.  It was exhibited at the Paris Exhibition of 1855 and put into regular service.  It was considered a failure and had a short operating life.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, August 21, 2010 10:13 AM

While not having the largest drivers, NYC&HR 999 was originally equipped with 86" drivers.  The locomotive was later re-boilered and re-equipped with smaller drivers.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 22, 2010 1:01 PM

Class P-2 Atlantics of the Burlington & Missouri River RR had 84-1/4" dia. drivers.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,312 posts
Posted by locoi1sa on Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:23 PM

 PRR S1 had 84 inch drivers. There are unofficial reports of the famous K4 and T1 locos doing over a buck ten on the flats with 14 to 16 cars in tow. There are stories of round house foremen tossing the speed recorder charts in the firebox to cover some of the valuable engine men from losing their jobs.

        Pete

 I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!

 I started with nothing and still have most of it left!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austria
  • 71 posts
Posted by Kiwigerd on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:07 AM

Hi everyone,

 the steamer with the largest drivers I know of is the east German DR 18 201. Their drivers have a d diameter of 90''. The top speed is rated at 180 km/h (approx. 112 mph), as the loco develops relatively meagre 1600 kW only. The design is a 4-6-2 btw.

Gerd 

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: Osoyoos BC
  • 84 posts
Posted by bigduke76 on Wednesday, August 25, 2010 12:11 AM

 in addition to the ATSF & milw. hudsons w/ 84" drivers, the C& NW had hudsons, and the milw's streamline atlantics had 84" dia. also - as of the mid to late 1930's.  alas only one machine still exists in North America out of all these: ATSF hudson 3461 on display in wichita KS.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy