Trains.com

big 0-8-0

3863 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 187 posts
big 0-8-0
Posted by IA and eastern on Friday, May 24, 2019 2:43 PM

Who had the most powerful 0-8-0s. Gary

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, May 24, 2019 2:46 PM

Almost surely the three-cylinder IHB locomotives (as made famous by model railroad companies in multiple scales!)

Much more fun is 'who had the most powerful 2-8-0s'?  I'd bring up the L&NE locomotives (at least, with their auxiliary locomotives cut in) or one of the D&H experimentals... both those classes are almost 'honorary 0-8-0s' anyway with as much adhesive weight as possible while still leaving a trackable Bissel for guiding.

  • Member since
    April 2018
  • 89 posts
Posted by NS6770fan on Friday, May 24, 2019 5:04 PM

Well the Pennsy had the heaviest 0-8-0s which were the C1s. They were the largest two cylinder 0-8-0s ever built. They had 56” drivers and weighed 287,000 pounds with a tractive effort of 76,000 pounds.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Friday, May 24, 2019 5:42 PM

The IHB 0-8-0 had two cyl 23-1/2 x 32 and one cyl 23-1/2 x 28, 200 psi, and drivers 57, so nominal TE 75700 lb plus 13800 lb from the tender booster.

The PRR 0-8-0 was built with 60% cutoff -- wonder if it kept it. Cyl 27 x 30, 250 psi, drivers 56, nominal TE 76155 assuming 78% MEP.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, June 4, 2019 11:10 AM

I seem to recall that the 0-8-0s built for Oliver Iron Mining (Mesabi Iron Range in Minnesota) by Lima in the 1920's were thought to be the most powerful 0-8-0s ever built?

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Wednesday, June 5, 2019 6:46 PM

1930 Cyc says OIM 700 had cyl 23 x 28, drivers 50, 225 psi, 70%? cutoff, so 55500 lb TE (80% MEP) plus 14000 lb from the tender booster.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, June 6, 2019 6:59 AM

I would opine that the OIM 0-8-0's were smaller than either the IHB U-4a's or the PRR C-1's, probably due in part to the nature of the trackage over which they operated.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy