Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Steam & Preservation
»
Why modern steam?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Decades ago, there was a feature in TRAINS titled "Did we scrap steam too soon?" and, if I remember correctly, the answer was no.</p> <p>There had been many attempts to increase the efficiency of steam locomotives, from better insulation of boilers to steam turbine drives and even steam motors - they all could not improve it anywhere near to the efficiency of Diesels or Electrics. The operation of steam locomotives always remained a fairly "dirty" operation, requiring a much higher number of personnel and short intervals between maintenance stops. What was the longest daily run of a steam loco in the hey days of steam, before it required servicing? Could not have been much more than 300 miles. Today´s ICE trains in Europe have daily runs of three to five times that figure, with only one engineer in the cab, not two.</p> <p>As much as we steam buffs would like to see the resurrection of steam, it is most unlikely in whatsoever form, even if the world runs out of crude oil as the prime source of energy. In that case, it would be more economical to turn the remaining fossil fuels into electricity and string wires over our rails.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy