Trains.com

Best Articulated Locomotives

1714 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2013
  • 5 posts
Best Articulated Locomotives
Posted by AC 12 on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:59 PM

I am a fan of the Southern Pacific Cab Forwards. You can still see one (not operable) at the Sacramento California Stat Railroad Museum. The 4294, the last 4-8-8-2 SP Cab Forward built "show it self off quite well in the museum.

Built for the Donner grade (Roseville, CA to Sparks, NV) over a ruling grade of 2.2%. The route of the Snow Sheds (according to an old-time engineer, the route of 28 miles inside a house!

 

These locomotives did a fine job on the HILL and were moved All Over the SP System becauseof their usefullnes

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,357 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:18 PM

AC 12
These locomotives did a fine job on the HILL and were moved All Over the SP System because of their usefullness

But the AC-9s were still better locomotives, and drop-dead beautiful too!

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 4:07 PM

The best lookin' articulateds?  Well, my vote (votes)  goes to the N&W's Class A and the Delaware and Hudson's  (remember them?)  Challengers, handsomer locomotives than the UP variety.

Don't get your knickers in a twist Uncle Pete fans, I'm not saying the UP Challengers were ugly, far from it, I'm saying D&H's beat them in the looks department.

D&H was a class act, it's a shame they don't get more attention.

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: CAPE CORAL FLA
  • 492 posts
Posted by thomas81z on Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:14 PM

Firelock76

The best lookin' articulateds?  Well, my vote (votes)  goes to the N&W's Class A and the Delaware and Hudson's  (remember them?)  Challengers, handsomer locomotives than the UP variety.

Don't get your knickers in a twist Uncle Pete fans, I'm not saying the UP Challengers were ugly, far from it, I'm saying D&H's beat them in the looks department.

D&H was a class act, it's a shame they don't get more attention.

im an uncle pete fan ,& your right everybody thinks union pacific when you mention challengers lol , D&H & clinchfield & who else ran them , never got alot of press ,

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 460 posts
Posted by JimValle on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:21 AM

I agree that the AC-9 is handsomer than the AC-12.  It was also a little heavier and slightly more powerful.  It was built to run in semi-desert and desert conditions but when the weather was hot the crews really suffered on the AC-9 because the all weather cab didn't ventilate very well.  SP men were accustomed to the exceptional visibility of the cab-forwards so the AC-9s were less popular on that account as well.  As for me, I've got examples of both classes in HO brass by Katsumi and if anybody wants to take them, they'll have to pry them out of my cold dead hands!

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,015 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:07 AM

I like the D&H Challengers for looks, but the N&W A for performance, reliability, and economy.   The Missabi 2-8--8-4's for tractive effort/power.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy