Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Dear GP-40-2,'44 seemed to be an interesting year, as many RR attempted to achieve ----- diesels, which were limited, although, and therefore not granted to every RR. Their final steam-results were still impressive, based on first investment/HP, but not main- / running costs in the end (personal, I like those casted frames and roller bearings-/articulation-/suspension design).I would better say, for ex., the Big boy were av. 3600+ DBHP engines uphill, than those allways proclaimed 6290HP peak, and this says a lot, comparing diesel like an FT or F3-threesome . Take a double headed 2-10-2 TTT uphill, that's pretty the same... -The EM's seems to be nice engines, can you tell me more about them?  Th'xlars --BTW "academic" is a fine way, calculated, theoretical or historical. Mostly I know is the last one, but tells the same story, if followed carefully like the first two ones ;-)
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag