Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Steam & Preservation
»
What a Challenger could really do...
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Some additional infos about that 3985-APL run in '91:<br><br>Hope not repeating something, but in fact the run was, <br>with the one notable exception at Archer Hill, a downhill run.</p><p>The average speed of that train was in the upper forties.<br><br>Just look at the elevation at Cheyenne and North Platte. I think the constant loss over that distance is -0.25%.<br>I believe Tim has the most detailed plans about the track condition.<br><br>Another fact, does not have those multi-linked double-stack trains some general advantage in rolling resistance?<br>If not, why there were built like that... OK, some others, too, train length, less dead weight, etc.<br><br>Consider also that the engine was totally overhauled at that time, <br>burning oil and others advantages... I think all that helped to do the trick, <br>regardless it produced 4700 or 5000 DBHP. Delta is less than 10%, <br>that a fine estimation in my eyes. <br><br>Let a train like that running through sags, <br>we might have even accelerated to nearly 70mph, for a short time.<br><br>A Challenger would not be good to pull constantly 7000 tons at a grade of 0.7%. The grade of 0.82%, was the most commonly used grade between Wahsatch and Cheyenne. A Chally was rated<br>4290tons, 1948- era friction wheels, considering an av. speed of 15-20mph.<br><br>There were 3 GE-Dash's, I think that is correct, that pulled the train into Cheyenne, than Chally took over it.<br>The Train it took back to Cheyenne, now running constly. 0.25% up, was much smaller, 1000tons, or so.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyZD7fJ12WI&feature=related" mce_href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyZD7fJ12WI&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyZD7fJ12WI&feature=related</a></p><p><br>If anybody would like to have a sequence of the tape for more infos, post me, I digitized it.<br><br>What I want to say, seen from a overall performance, it is pretty that of an AC4400.<br><br>If you really want a mess, look at this...</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoGBL0XFjQ8" mce_href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoGBL0XFjQ8">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoGBL0XFjQ8</a></p><p> </p><p>Cheers<br><br>lars</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy