Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
Steam & Preservation
»
Le Massena's "Big Engines" article (1968 Trains)
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Ooops,</p><p> UP4-12-2,</p><p>my bad, I did not read your mail carefully enough. </p><p>I understand Jabelman did not like roller-bearings. That he did not favor the 9000 is plausible, and valid, in my humble opinion, proved by the latter designs. </p><p>The boiler and firebox of the 3900's in fact does not diifer so much from the 9000's, though the shape became different. <br></p><p>They were big improvements over the elderly "Moose's" , however. Otherwise, it was up to Lima und C&O to prove, 2 cyl. and 2 rods are up to such kind of piston forces, making the third cyl. somewhat obsolete.</p><p>I meant of course 6000 indicated HP for the T1 (or 5400DBHP, if this is acceptable). </p><p>Cheers,</p><p>lars </p><p>-edit-</p><p>BTW,</p><p>If you can think "Popular Mechanics" is a reliable source, I read there modern UP-engines had an expected life-time cycle of 3million miles or 30 years. <br></p><p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy