Trains.com

The SP GS-6 4460

7907 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Levenworth, WA.
  • 156 posts
The SP GS-6 4460
Posted by SP4460 on Monday, May 26, 2008 4:17 PM

The SP’s 4460 GS-6 was delivered July31, 1943 and was vacated from the roster in 58’ and donated to the Transportation Museum in St. Louis in 59’. Now this locomotive has only had 15 years of being used and I remember reading some place that when it was vacated it was in need of class 2 boiler work.

Most of the pic’s I have seen of the 4460 she she been under cover in St. Louis, which is better then the 4449 had in Portland, but was she kept oiled like the 4449 was (As I under stand the oiling was one of the biggest reasons why she was rebuilt for the freedom train).

I fell in love with the 4449 when I saw it in 2000 when it ran the BNSF Employee Special, I have seen her in all of her colors (AFT, BNSF, Daylight with big SP and small SP and the “War-Baby” black) I have road behind it 2 time and seen it about ten. From the first time I talked to Doyle McCormack in 2000 I wanted to do what he did and restore locomotives, most of all I wanted a northern. I stumbled across the 4460 and the 1st pic I saw I new that was the one I wanted to rebuild.

I wish to someday rebuild the GS-6 if I be 30 or 60 it’s a dream, I just hope that St. Louis in not like Sacramento and not let it get restored (Sacramento R.R. Museum has been ask by a few people with deep pocket if they could get the Cab Forward running  but they have turned all of them down because they want to keep it for them self) If anyone has any information on the 4460 or any ideas on how to go about doing such a project ( $ or metal work…ect) it be nice to hear from you.

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.rayman4449.dynip.com/sp4422.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.rayman4449.dynip.com/4449_photo1.htm&h=540&w=786&sz=90&hl=en&start=18&um=1&tbnid=7WrELMwZc72X4M:&tbnh=98&tbnw=143&prev=/images%3Fq%3DSP%2BGS-6%2B4460%26ndsp%3D20%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN[/img]

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Redneck Land(Little Rock), Arkansas
  • 919 posts
Posted by arkansasrailfan on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:29 PM
that would be hard to accomplish nowadays, particulary since oil is $120 a barrel, less people are interested, not to mention the money and insurence. SLSF 1522 is at the same museum, and it once ran, but insurance finished its career. also, 4460 is also a big engine. then UP is the only connecting railroad, and you can deadhead, but they have a no-steam-engine-besides-ours policy
Now here is the real bigy about the Cab fwrd. Simply, its too big, along with again, UP is the only railroad connecting.
There are plenty of steam engines running especially SP. focus first on keeping them running and looking at them while you can. the road ahead is going to get really bumpy ahead...

P.S. yes it is really just a dream. and no Sacremtento RR Museum does not want the Cab Fwrd to them selves
-Michael It's baaaacccckkkk!!!!!! www.youtube.com/user/wyomingrailfan
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 800 Mi. from Espee Siskiyou line MP. 630.6 Orygun
  • 298 posts
Posted by WP 3020 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:08 AM

Getting another northern running is a dream of many people but it may only be a dream. especially the 4460. The N&W J would probably be a more simple project. It was operational not too many years ago and burns coal. If memory serves me, part of the reason NS started running steam was because some people were trying to gather backing and PR for exploration in new and better ways to get energy from coal. But running any steam loco is a complex operation. Where do you run them? Especially a northern? I don't want to be the one to drop the fire but face it, steam is a luxury. I think it would be more advantageous to put your efforts into keeping the steam that is now operational running and not let the steam support get spread out too thin.  

Can anyone imagine what it would take just to move 4294 out of the museum?

Railroads are "a device of Satan to lead immortal souls to hell." - an Ohio school board, 1831 - quoted in CTC Board 8/05 "If you ever wonder how you have freedom... Think, a veteran!!!" - My thought 1/08 Hey man, I don't have to try to remember the 60's... I lived too close to Eugene, Oregon.
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Levenworth, WA.
  • 156 posts
Posted by SP4460 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:02 AM

         I under stand about how hard it would be to accomplish, and oil is just stupid right now and with the value of money going down I mean how far could 1 to 1.5 mill get you anymore? (Counting chickens before there hatched is bad, but that is amount or more that may be acquired at some point in time in the next 30 years)

About the UP I here its starting to be “more steam friendly” or at least that’s what some of the guys with the 844 said when it was up in Washington. I still think that if you got the 4460 running the UP would let the it run for a short time to transfer to BNSF track like they do in Portland for the 4449.

In truth the only thing I worry about is the thing that killed the 1522 and that’s the insurance, the rest of the project would almost take care of its self, once it gets started. And with the 1522 being at the same museum that means that the guys that worked on her are near by so there you have much help in experience right there. (Is the 1522 stored serviced?)

The Cab Fwrd would be neat to see but your right it is to big for running nowadays. From what I know the Sacramento RR Museum dose not want to lose its centerpiece, so they do not let people restore it.

Yes I know that rebuilding the 4460 is like 1000 to 1 but it’s nice to think about “what if this happened”. Till the day that some how she get rebuilt I will enjoy the steam we have running. And lets hope that the road ahead don’t get to bad.

 

Thanks for your reply.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 800 Mi. from Espee Siskiyou line MP. 630.6 Orygun
  • 298 posts
Posted by WP 3020 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:05 AM
I'm wondering why there are two posts about the same subject at the same time? I just happened to respond to this one first because I saw it on the main menu. This is getting redundant all over again. On the other post, http://cs.trains.com/forums/1308026/ShowPost.aspx ,4merroad4man's reply explained in detail what I was trying to explain. Had I known that he had already written it, I wouldn't have wasted my time with this one. This one has come full circle after two replies but with yet another rumor. "The UP I here is its starting to be 'more steam friendly'..." Hey, just because they had 4449 run with 844. Woo-Freaken-Hoo... 4449 has a good and proven track record. What other 4-8-4 loco operation running can compare to what Doyle and crew have done and would Youpee let them run on their tracks? I think I'll put my money on seeing a Little Joe operate on the Milwaukee ROW over the Cascades again.
Railroads are "a device of Satan to lead immortal souls to hell." - an Ohio school board, 1831 - quoted in CTC Board 8/05 "If you ever wonder how you have freedom... Think, a veteran!!!" - My thought 1/08 Hey man, I don't have to try to remember the 60's... I lived too close to Eugene, Oregon.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:28 AM

 SP4460 wrote:

About the UP I here its starting to be "more steam friendly" or at least that's what some of the guys with the 844 said when it was up in Washington. I still think that if you got the 4460 running the UP would let the it run for a short time to transfer to BNSF track like they do in Portland for the 4449.

 

  Not to be a Party Pooper, but if you think that Union Pacific is getting more "Friendly" towards outside Steam, you REALLY need to read Trains Magazine Special Edition of "Steam Today". Please go to page 20 and read the side bar article that addresses this very subject. Doyle is both Lucky and Thankful that UP lets him use their tracks to reach Friendly trackage. UP must obviously have a LOT of respect for Doyle and his abilities to not only allow him this priviledge, but it is my understanding that Doyle and crew have had the use of the Brooklyn Roundhouse FREE of CHARGE. UP has also been very generous in giving the ORHF a considerable amount of time to locate a new home, which Hopefully has been found, and the deal will go through. So while UP may not be very open to allowing outside Steam on their tracks, They HAVE been VERY GENEROUS in regards to some outside Steam.

                                                                              Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Levenworth, WA.
  • 156 posts
Posted by SP4460 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:29 PM

    I am sorry but I did just see that post was right under the one I did today also. I did not find it till the day after I made the post. I am sorry for the bring it up so soon but after awhile most of the subjects get talked a lot more then once. But I am sorry they are so close.

    I just wanted to see if anyone had actually ever looked at it, if any thing have been done to it. but all I have gotten is just shut down. Stop the idea be for you go anymore there is no point in it.  4merroad4man is a 100% right on all that he said I don’t deny that. But am tired of people just settling, no one want to go out and do anything anymore its much nice to say its to hard and not go out and accomplish anything. I think its stupid that people are so worry of failure that they will not even try. (Sorry but I hate it when ever someone brings up rebuilding something all you get here is negativity)

    I know that all the cost that it would take to rebuild it and the amount you would make running, and they would never be near to balancing out. The cons out way the pros a lot and they always will, but that don’t mean you cant dream or at least try.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Levenworth, WA.
  • 156 posts
Posted by SP4460 on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:31 PM
about the “more steam friendly” thing I was told that by 844 guys, am sorry I said it but that is what I was told, nothing more.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:31 AM

Hi SP4460,

   I Hope that You did not take my comment in a Rude context, it most definitely was not meant in that way. The mentioned article does explain Union Pacific's policy on outside Steam, and I thought that it would give You the information straight from the horse's mouth.

                                                    Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Levenworth, WA.
  • 156 posts
Posted by SP4460 on Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:43 AM

First off thanks Doug for taking time your time and talking.

            It was more at WP 3020 when he said “yet another rumor” and how he went about saying that it was wrong statement, it just sparked a little irritation. It was not intended to be a rumor! A few of the 844 crew had stated that the UP may get more steam friendly, so I stated what I had been told, and with it being said last year and with what I have been reading, I can see I was wrong in saying it. I under stand the UP's policy on outside steam and though I may not like it that is how it is. I guess I was hoping it would change and I guess I should have not put so much faith on them saying it changing.

            Sorry for the little out burst but it is kind of irritating how fast the subject of rebuilding a steam engine gets shot down.

 

   

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Thursday, May 29, 2008 6:48 AM

  OOHHH, How I wish it weren't so. I myself would LOVE to see more Steam returned to the land of the living. Unfortunately these days the costs and obstacles are beyond belief when it comes to putting the breath of life into these Magnificent machines.

                                                   Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    April 2012
  • 1 posts
Posted by GP49PHS on Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:29 PM

I am on the same boat. I fell in love with the engine and knew it would be my goal to see it on the road someday.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 3,218 posts
Posted by Stourbridge Lion on Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:33 PM

GP49PHS - Welcome to trains.com! Cowboy

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 71 posts
Posted by nwo4rf on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 8:14 AM

Ok...UP is steam friendly. But as Seven Lee told me before his retierment. It is more about the people behind the locomotive than the locomotive its self. The UP dose not want a bunch of rich spoiled brat railfans on their line trying to run a steam locomotive with no idea of what they are doing, other than "we'er going to be famous for restoreing this locomotive'. If you look in the past the only steam that has been allowed to run over the UP has been "Class Acts" 4449, 700, 1522, and 261. The people that run these locomotives have proven themselfs to the UP (as well as NS and BN) that they know how to run a steam program and respect the railroads that let them run on their rails.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy