Trains.com

CN should do Heritage units

14181 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,860 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, November 20, 2006 10:43 PM

And just for the record, HTML tags don't work here.  Forum code resembles it, but uses [].

As for the heritage unit idea, methinks you'd have to go back a ways to find more than has been mentioned.

On the other hand, CSX and NS might have some interesting subjects to choose from.  There's still a lot of BNSF predecessor stuff still on the rails.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, November 20, 2006 9:25 PM

 KBCpresident wrote:
I'm trying to say "Here is a railroad that owes us some Heritage Units...Canadian National. and then I am simply asking if you think any user is under 21.

     Okay.  I'll ask....why?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oregon
  • 563 posts
Posted by KBCpresident on Monday, November 20, 2006 6:26 PM
 coborn35 wrote:

 KBCpresident wrote:
Here isa railroad that owes s some Heritage Units...Canadian National. Do you think anyone here is under 21?

Why? Are you a pervert or something?

What exactly are you trying to say?

I'm trying to say "Here is a railroad that owes us some Heritage Units...Canadian National. and then I am simply asking if you think any user is under 21.

The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad

"Ruby Line Service"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Pisa, IT
  • 1,474 posts
Posted by RR Redneck on Monday, November 20, 2006 5:41 PM
Seen all but the SP (my favorite) unit. I am keepin vigilant though.

Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 20, 2006 5:40 PM
Lets not forget that IC is a part of CN.
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 29 posts
Posted by poop on Monday, November 20, 2006 5:16 PM

Those Union Pacific heritage units are awesome! I have yet to see one in person though. I am glad that they at least did something. (better than no heritage units)    CN should paint some classic Grand Trunk heritage engine. (even though there are still many GTW engines around) The GT is my favorite railroad, and that would be awesome to see CN make a GT heritage unit! It's too bad that CN painted the two green/gold E-units into the newer red/black. I am glad that they still have the four E's, two painted for Illinois Central!

 

Robert Jackson

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: KS
  • 987 posts
Posted by SFbrkmn on Monday, November 20, 2006 3:48 PM
I really have not been exicited on hertitage eng painting. What UP did was mainly to protect their company logos and in my opinion has become very  overated. Shippers are doing business with UP, BNSF, NS and so forth--not MP, MKT, CNW, WAB, GN, Frisco and so on.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: DeKalb, IL
  • 145 posts
Posted by senshi on Monday, November 20, 2006 11:50 AM
 BNSFrailfan wrote:
Wasn't the GM&O part of Frisco.


It was bought up by Illinois Central in the 70's I think.  That was when they changed their name to Illinois Central Gulf, CN from downtown Chicago to Joliet is old GM&O trackage.  It didn't work out too well and a bunch of the lines were sold off, eventually producing Gateway Western and teh SP line north from St. Louis.

Go Huskies. Forward Together Forward

Fan of - C&NW - Milwaukee Road - CGW -

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, November 20, 2006 9:43 AM
Wasn't the GM&O part of Frisco.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Monday, November 20, 2006 8:18 AM
What heritage? Canadian or American ? ? Remember Canadian National Railway was a Government of Canada run institution for years( a little bit of good old Canadian socialism) so what heritage would these locomotives represent? Oh, do you mean not CN but one of the American owned railroads CN bought, that makes sense. Interesting to find out if CN is a good corporate citizen eh?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Monday, November 20, 2006 12:08 AM

The only former railroads under the CN banner that would seriously qualify for Heritage Units are Central Vermont, Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific, and Gulf, Mobile & Ohio.

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Sunday, November 19, 2006 9:10 PM

 KBCpresident wrote:
Here isa railroad that owes s some Heritage Units...Canadian National. Do you think anyone here is under 21?

Why? Are you  a pervert or something?

What exactly are you trying to say?

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oregon
  • 563 posts
CN should do Heritage units
Posted by KBCpresident on Sunday, November 19, 2006 8:58 PM
Here isa railroad that owes s some Heritage Units...Canadian National. Do you think anyone here is under 21?

The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad

"Ruby Line Service"

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy