Trains.com

B&O Passenger Train Access to Chicago

4352 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
B&O Passenger Train Access to Chicago
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:33 AM
At the time Grand Central Station (Chicago) was abandoned by the B&O, they moved their trains (at least temporarily?) to North Western Station. With LaSalle Street & Dearborn practically next door, why the move and awkward approach (from the west) to C&NW? Even Union would've been easier, it seems to me, except that I'm sure Pennsy would have none of it.

Did B&O trains always approach downtown from the west?

I seem to remember reading somewhwere that C&NW had to raise the trainshed roof to accomodate the B&O's dome cars but I find it hard to believe that they would spend that much money to accomodate a tenant's equipment.

Enlightenment, please!

Thanks!
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:44 AM
The move to North Western Station was not as odd as it sounds. B&O had a rather convoluted entry into Chicago. it entered from Northwest Indiana paralleling PRR and NYC. Just north of 95th St., it swung west on trackage rights on RI through Pullman Jct. and part of RI's Suburban branch, picking up the B&OCT just east of Western Ave., where it headed north through Brighton Park and Ash interlockings to near 18th St., turning east for the run to Grand Central.

La Salle may have been considered. I'm not sure if the trackage arrangement at Pullman Junction would have allowed a connection to Dearborn.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:07 AM
I don't think they raised any roofs. The C&O and B&O trains were usually put on Tracks 1 and 2, and though its possible that tracks were slightly lowered, I doubt that any track that could accommodate CNW bilevel cars wouldn't have been able to handle B&O's low-profile dome cars as well.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:32 PM
I beleve at least some of the sheds at Northwestern Station were raised in the early 1950s to accomidate the City Trains when they aquired dome cars.
Bob
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:20 PM
I checked my August, 1955 Official Guide and came up with the following mileages and times for various railroads between Chicago and Gary, In:

B&O Capital Limited 33.3 miles to Gary. Scheduled time - 61 minutes
PRR The General 25 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 37 minutes
NYC Twilight Ltd. 29.7 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 38 minutes....this was via the IC and teh Michigan Central routing for Detroit.
NYC Commander Vanderbuilt
26.1 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 34 minutes...this was from Lasalle Street to Englewood.

As you can see, the B&O was at a disadvantage of 23 to 27 minutes from Northwest Indiana. Granted these trains did not solicit short haul passengers, but still, it was an extra 25 minutes or so on common points.

ed
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MP173

I checked my August, 1955 Official Guide and came up with the following mileages and times for various railroads between Chicago and Gary, In:

B&O Capital Limited 33.3 miles to Gary. Scheduled time - 61 minutes
PRR The General 25 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 37 minutes
NYC Twilight Ltd. 29.7 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 38 minutes....this was via the IC and teh Michigan Central routing for Detroit.
NYC Commander Vanderbuilt
26.1 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 34 minutes...this was from Lasalle Street to Englewood.

As you can see, the B&O was at a disadvantage of 23 to 27 minutes from Northwest Indiana. Granted these trains did not solicit short haul passengers, but still, it was an extra 25 minutes or so on common points.

ed



Yes, but. After a long day in DC it was great to catch the Westbound Capital for a ride in the dome up the Potomic Valley to Cumberland and beyond. The dome cars were equiped with spot lights so you got this wierd passing view of the landscape a few yards off the row.
Bob
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:41 PM
The B&O Station was on high-value real estate at the time and Mayor Dailey the 1st one wanted to reduce the number of stations.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:00 PM
What address was Grand Central Station?

The whole south loop area today has just exploded.

ed
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, February 16, 2006 11:36 PM

QUOTE: Originally posted by MP173

I checked my August, 1955 Official Guide and came up with the following mileages and times for various railroads between Chicago and Gary, In:

B&O Capital Limited 33.3 miles to Gary. Scheduled time - 61 minutes
PRR The General 25 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 37 minutes
NYC Twilight Ltd. 29.7 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 38 minutes....this was via the IC and teh Michigan Central routing for Detroit.
NYC Commander Vanderbuilt
26.1 miles to Gary Scheduled time - 34 minutes...this was from Lasalle Street to Englewood.

As you can see, the B&O was at a disadvantage of 23 to 27 minutes from Northwest Indiana. Granted these trains did not solicit short haul passengers, but still, it was an extra 25 minutes or so on common points.

ed



The B&O route into Grand Central Station was convoluted and time consuming and it was one of the reason quit using the F3's they had purchased for Passenger Service in passenger service out of Chicago as the generally had consumed all their water supply for the steam generators by the time the trains reached Garret, the next division point and opportunity to top off on fuel and water.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, February 17, 2006 7:48 AM
Grand Central was on the southwest corner of Harrison and Wells Streets.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Saturday, February 18, 2006 5:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

I don't think they raised any roofs. The C&O and B&O trains were usually put on Tracks 1 and 2, and though its possible that tracks were slightly lowered, I doubt that any track that could accommodate CNW bilevel cars wouldn't have been able to handle B&O's low-profile dome cars as well.


If I remember, there was an overhead passage from the station concourse to the Lake Street L station that was over track 1 (later moved to track/platform level). Maybe that accounted for extra clearance that C&NW used to put the Capitol's domes on that track? It sure seems to me, too, that a shed that would fit bilevels would fit domes, too.
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, February 18, 2006 7:27 AM
As long as the "Northwest Passage" was there, it was at ground level inside the shed, taking the place of Track 1 after C&O/B&O passenger trains were terminated. No evidence of height increase visible on photos of end of shed.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, August 2, 2022 9:32 PM

 

 

 

Northwestern Station:

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, August 2, 2022 9:41 PM

daveklepper

 

 

 

Transited through Grand Central many times during the period of 1959-1963.

 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Tuesday, August 2, 2022 10:31 PM

Took the Capitol on a field trip to DC from Grand Central in 1967. Have a memory of the slow and roundabout route to get out of Chicago. Loved the castle-like tower and expansive trainshed of the terminal. A real shame it was torn down. Had it lasted, could have been a showpiece today, particularly since Chicago is known for its architecture. 

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • 2,671 posts
Posted by Lithonia Operator on Tuesday, August 2, 2022 10:37 PM

This thread took a 16-year hiatus. I wonder if that's a record?

Still in training.


  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, August 3, 2022 2:33 AM

Only the pictures showing trains, all the Capital Limited, are mine.  And  I did ride the last CL out out of GC, on a business trip to DC, returning to the C&NW Station.

THe C&O owned the B&O by then and  had a surplus of E-8s, with its reduction from three to one Newpot News and Washibgton - Cincinnati train.

The other photos are from other threads on this Forum.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, August 3, 2022 2:37 AM

Reviving the thread was intended to provide interest and background for the newly-scanned Northwestern Station photos.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:19 AM

I also rode the CL between Chicago and DC several times. Always enjoyed the food and the early morning scenery on the eastward trip

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Wednesday, August 3, 2022 2:09 PM

Lets see 16 years ago I was only 51 years old...

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, August 9, 2022 12:36 PM

Gramp

Took the Capitol on a field trip to DC from Grand Central in 1967. Have a memory of the slow and roundabout route to get out of Chicago. Loved the castle-like tower and expansive trainshed of the terminal. A real shame it was torn down. Had it lasted, could have been a showpiece today, particularly since Chicago is known for its architecture. 

Grand Central was designed by Solon S. Beman, who is better known for his work in the design of Pullman.  The station was modeled after a Norman fortress, a general style which fell out of favor to be replaced by the Classical style only a few years after the staion was built.  The location was not too good either until the Eisenhower Expressway was built just a block north of the station and opened up the land north of Harrison Street, affording a nice view of the station.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:44 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
 
Gramp

Took the Capitol on a field trip to DC from Grand Central in 1967. Have a memory of the slow and roundabout route to get out of Chicago. Loved the castle-like tower and expansive trainshed of the terminal. A real shame it was torn down. Had it lasted, could have been a showpiece today, particularly since Chicago is known for its architecture.  

Grand Central was designed by Solon S. Beman, who is better known for his work in the design of Pullman.  The station was modeled after a Norman fortress, a general style which fell out of favor to be replaced by the Classical style only a few years after the staion was built.  The location was not too good either until the Eisenhower Expressway was built just a block north of the station and opened up the land north of Harrison Street, affording a nice view of the station.

The B&OCT/RI route from Grand Central to Pine Jct was a one hour jaunt for the 30 route miles of the trip.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:22 PM
 

MP173
What address was Grand Central Station?

The whole south loop area today has just exploded.

ed

 

201 West Harrison Street

 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:40 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

 

 
Gramp

Took the Capitol on a field trip to DC from Grand Central in 1967. Have a memory of the slow and roundabout route to get out of Chicago. Loved the castle-like tower and expansive trainshed of the terminal. A real shame it was torn down. Had it lasted, could have been a showpiece today, particularly since Chicago is known for its architecture. 

 

 

Grand Central was designed by Solon S. Beman, who is better known for his work in the design of Pullman.  The station was modeled after a Norman fortress, a general style which fell out of favor to be replaced by the Classical style only a few years after the staion was built.  The location was not too good either until the Eisenhower Expressway was built just a block north of the station and opened up the land north of Harrison Street, affording a nice view of the station.

 

Romanesque Revival is the term used.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy