Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
South Dakota vs BNSF
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/11440389.htm <br /> <br />Compared to the Montana situation, South Dakota has more leverage, in that they originally purchased the Milwaukee tracks east of Miles City, and those tracks can connect to CP up north in North Dakota. While Montana depends on legislated tax manipulation to get it's hoped for rate reductions, South Dakota can rely on market based solutions (rate reductions from railroads competing head to head) if they win these court cases.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy