Trains.com

Armed man arrested after stopping Amtrak train

3356 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Armed man arrested after stopping Amtrak train
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 3:28 PM

OXFORD, Neb. –  Authorities say an armed 25-year-old Missouri man managed to get into an Amtrak locomotive and pull the train's emergency brake in southeast Nebraska. The Lincoln Journal Star reports the incident happened on an eastbound California Zephyr train with about 175 people aboard passing near Oxford, Nebraska, about 200 miles (321.85 kilometers) southwest of Omaha. The Furnas County sheriff's office says the man had a loaded .38-caliber revolver in his waist and a speed loader in his pocket. Deputies found three more speed loaders, a box of ammunition, a knife, tin snips and a ventilation mask.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/8853cae9-14eb-31c3-b889-97bf4400819f/ss_armed-man-arrested-after.html

I can just see the guy announce to the Engineer, "Take this train to ______ (insert country here). I suppose we will soon be seeing locks on locomotives that are lockable from the inside. I wonder if the inward-facing camera captured the event.

Excitement in Mookie's area!

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 3:31 PM

zardoz
. I suppose we will soon be seeing locks on locomotives that are lockable from the inside.

We have them.  Doesn't everyone? 

I'm wondering if he didn't go into a trailing engine.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:05 PM

Alternate news source says he dumped the air from the trailing unit.

Trying to make sure he was locked up safely before the cat got em?  Kinda hard to get to StL on #6.Dunce

 

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:41 PM

I don't know how he could get into more than the trailing unit. And then only if it was facing forward. There is no access from the front of a P42 unit, only the rear. E units had a nose door. 

When I rode the Copper Canyon train, we were able to walk through the train and cross over onto the locomotive (while running) and along the side of the locomotive (a GP?) and into the cab. I was somewhat uncomfortable doing it (speed was maybe 30-40 mph) but a missed step... Wife was with me plus two others and our tour guide. 

Larry's passengers could do the same. But I think it would be severely frowned upon. 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 4:55 PM

mudchicken

Alternate news source says he dumped the air from the trailing unit.

Trying to make sure he was locked up safely before the cat got em?  Kinda hard to get to StL on #6.Dunce

 

 

          In this day and time, with various 'hijacking situations' being as they are: everything is now couched with 'politica'l motivations.  "The Media" being as they are(?) ZzzSigh 

The story linked here, and some other, 'news articles' out there; is it any wonder that the description of the 'miscreant' who boarded the AMTRAK unit with tin snips, revolver, and extra reloads of ammunition and a breathing mask, ( maybe, was an attempt to 'kitbash' the power on the trainCaptain). 

  Lately, news always leaves much to be described?   Had it been an American of a description that was ethincally" correct"(?). The description would include EVERYTHING about him[her?] .

   The media  would be interviewing neighbors, family, school chums,  former baby sitters,etc. Checking grades in grade school, and activities in High School.  We've seen it too many times, of late....

    Where are the unanswered questions ?  From 'country of birth', and 'rel...n' ,etc.  and on and on.        Instead the reportage is sadly lacking; holes and gaps that a stack train could pass through.    Bang Head 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 5:04 PM

Electroliner 1935
Larry's passengers could do the same. But I think it would be severely frowned upon. 

We frown on our own people doing it...

It can be disconcerting to have the door of an F unit open behind you as you're running at track speed...  Of course, if you're the one coming through the door, you'd best have your hearing protection in place.  A 567 in notch 8 isn't exactly the quietest thing...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 5:16 PM

tree68
A 567 in notch 8 isn't exactly the quietest thing...

Back in the late fifties, On the PRR at 90 mph, on an E8, the "facilities" are on the engineers side in front of the steam generator and near the end of the 2nd 567. They didn't have hearing protection back then. But it would have been helpful. But when you have to, you...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, October 24, 2017 6:21 PM

zardoz
Excitement in Mookie's area!

That is such a quiet rural area, I think the only excitement was the trespasser in the 2nd motor - all by himself for a short time.  Someone should dump his air....

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 36 posts
Posted by LAWRENCE SMITH on Thursday, October 26, 2017 7:44 PM

Electroliner, where in the late 50s could you run an E unit at 90 on the PRR? I assume not under catenary so somewhere W of Harrisburg? 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, October 27, 2017 7:03 AM

LAWRENCE SMITH

Electroliner, where in the late 50s could you run an E unit at 90 on the PRR? I assume not under catenary so somewhere W of Harrisburg? 

 
I would assume that the Chicago-Fort Wayne line would be one location and some points on the Indianapolis-St. Louis line would also allow it.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Friday, October 27, 2017 12:36 PM

LAWRENCE SMITH
I assume not under catenary so somewhere W of Harrisburg? 

Yes, your assumption is correct. My experiences were on PRR's Buckeye Region which was based in Cincinnati and had the Cincinnati-Logansport, Cincinnati-Xenia, Indianapolis-Stubenville routes. The St Louis to Pittsburg line had cab signals from Indianapolis East to Pittsburg. Cincy-Xenia had standard ABS as did Cincy-Richmond. Richmond-Logansport was dark with Train Order rules but there were offices and interlockings at frequent intervals. But track was poor.

My experience at 90 mph was on a trip that I requested to "familiarize" myself to the Region. It was an all day trip Cincinnati-Logansport-Indianapolis-Stubenville-Cincinnati. In cab Cincy to Logansport and Indy to Stubenville and sleeper back to Cincinnati. On the Indianapolis to Stubenville portion, Cab signals were in operation and on much of the route, speeds of 90mph were reached. East of Richmond, we had fog and all we could see was the headlight reflecting off the fog. Had some angst over what we could not see and hoped that no poor soul was where they should be. (on the ROW) and fortunately we ran out of the fog and arrived Dayton. I love the way E units rode. On the times I rode coach on the Logansport, the old coaches danced on the jointed rail but the E's left me with the impression that a gymnast could do a handstand in the ccab and have no problems. 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 36 posts
Posted by LAWRENCE SMITH on Monday, October 30, 2017 9:53 PM

This is great detail. I read an ETT on the Indy/Columbus line from the 50s that said the speed limiit was 70. So the cab signals allowed 90? 

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 4:17 PM

LAWRENCE SMITH
LAWRENCE SMITH wrote the following post yesterday: This is great detail. I read an ETT on the Indy/Columbus line from the 50s that said the speed limiit was 70. So the cab signals allowed 90? 

That was my memory but have not been able to find my ETT. Did find this from '65 and it shows 75 mph between Richmond and the division post east of Indianapolis. As the PRR was in financial trouble they may have chosen to not maintain it to that speed.

http://www.cincyrails.com/files/PRR_BuckeyeRegion-4-30-1961.pdf  See page 71

It's been 60 years since I took that ride and I,ve always thought we were doing over 80 mph but the crews wouldn't speed would they? Only negative was that the E-8's only had two seats so I was standing all the time except from Logansport to Indy and between Columbus & Newark when I went back to the diner for diner. The berth was welcome when I went back to Cincy.

Wonder whether PRR didn't want to discontinue Cab Signals due to the effort to go through the ICC. It had significant maintenance cost to operate, 100 Hz power line and MG frequency changer sets as well as all the code relays, etc. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 6:08 PM

In the 50's Maximum Speeds on various railroads were more of a 'suggestion' than they were a hard and fast limit.  It was a different time with different sensibilities than exist today.

My father was a Division Superintendent - His instructions to his engineers - if you need to make up time - as fast as the train will go - OBEY, curve restrictions, City Restrictions, Temporary Speed restrictions - everywhere else, go for it.

While PRR ETT's may have said 70 MPH max, I have little doubt that local management's thoughts mirrored my Fathers.  

The American Association of Railroad Superintendents was a signifigant organization in those days with many local chapters where an areas Superintendents met, networked and traded ideas.  https://supt.org/

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:06 PM

BaltACD
In the 50's Maximum Speeds on various railroads were more of a 'suggestion' than they were a hard and fast limit.  It was a different time with different sensibilities than exist today.

Recalling a story in Trains - an engineer (steam locomotive) departing Harmon for Albany was told "do not arrive in Albany before...."

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:15 PM

BaltACD
In the 50's Maximum Speeds on various railroads were more of a 'suggestion' than they were a hard and fast limit. It was a different time with different sensibilities than exist today. My father was a Division Superintendent - His instructions to his engineers - if you need to make up time - as fast as the train will go - OBEY, curve restrictions, City Restrictions, Temporary Speed restrictions - everywhere else, go for it.

This is fascinating because it represents a widespread, systemic, and specific violation of Federal law!  I believe as early as 1952 the strict application of the ICC train-control order of 1947 (enforcing the control provisions of 1920) applied across any line in 'the general system of transportation'; the permission to 90mph is interesting because it would represent the presence of one 'safety' system (likely continuous cab signals) but not another (some mandated form of train control or stop).

Can someone explain to me how this flouting of enacted law was managed, legally?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 8:17 PM

Overmod
 
BaltACD
In the 50's Maximum Speeds on various railroads were more of a 'suggestion' than they were a hard and fast limit. It was a different time with different sensibilities than exist today. My father was a Division Superintendent - His instructions to his engineers - if you need to make up time - as fast as the train will go - OBEY, curve restrictions, City Restrictions, Temporary Speed restrictions - everywhere else, go for it. 

This is fascinating because it represents a widespread, systemic, and specific violation of Federal law!  I believe as early as 1952 the strict application of the ICC train-control order of 1947 (enforcing the control provisions of 1920) applied across any line in 'the general system of transportation'; the permission to 90mph is interesting because it would represent the presence of one 'safety' system (likely continuous cab signals) but not another (some mandated form of train control or stop).

Can someone explain to me how this flouting of enacted law was managed, legally?

Who said leaglly!  The 1950's and the 21st Century are worlds apart with legalities and enforcement.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 8:38 PM

As Balt says, the speed limits were not exceeded legally. In the mid-sixties, I rode an engine for 100 miles on a line with ABS only--and except for a station stop and curves, the speedometer hovered on the 90 mph mark. On the same road, on another section of track, I timed a mile in 35 seconds.

As has been said, there was little, if any, real enforcement of the ICC's rules in some areas.

Now, when I am able to time using mile posts, I do not see any infractions of the rules.

 

Johnny

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 9:03 PM

BaltACD

 Who said leaglly!  The 1950's and the 21st Century are worlds apart with legalities and enforcement.

 

Even Rule "G" was mostly ignored, unless it became flagrant; ah, those were the days.....
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 9:28 PM
zardoz wrote the following post 23 minutes ago:

 

 
BaltACD

 Who said leaglly!  The 1950's and the 21st Century are worlds apart with legalities and enforcement.

 

 

Even Rule "G" was mostly ignored, unless it became flagrant; ah, those were the days.....
I would opine that at one time, the timetable was more important than the speed limits.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:10 PM

Deggesty
Now, when I am able to time using mile posts, I do not see any infractions of the rules.  

Using mileposts, how old fashioned. I just use a GPS app on my cellphone. I remember back in the early forties, mostly from my father, timing mileposts on a PRR train from Chicago to Lebanon IN. The train had been delayed because the Calunet River Bridge had been raised, ad after we got on the open Indiana ROW, standing in the last car's vestibule where he clocked us at over 90 mph. Also when I rode behind 611 on a Roanoke NRHS Chapter's Independence Limited and Mr. G Clayter was at the throttle between Belvue and Ft. Wayne, I was in the vestibule of the last car (observation) and while the ETT read speed max for passenger trains was 60, I clocked us at 51 seconds between MP's. Mentioned it to some of the engine crew enroute to the motel and they denyed any speeding. Who's going to tell the boss. But the thing that still impresses me was that the track was perfect. Looking up the length of the train, there was no motion between the cars. None. We could have been stopped, the cars had NO jouncing or motion at the diaphrams. That track could have been rated for 100+. Still carry a speed table but use GPS.

 

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:13 PM

Deggesty
Now, when I am able to time using mile posts, I do not see any infractions of the rules.  

Using mileposts, how old fashioned. I just use a GPS app on my cellphone. I remember back in the early forties, mostly from my father, timing mileposts on a PRR train from Chicago to Lebanon IN. The train had been delayed because the Calunet River Bridge had been raised, ad after we got on the open Indiana ROW, standing in the last car's vestibule where Dad clocked us (with his Hamilton watch) at over 90 mph. Also when I rode behind 611 on a Roanoke NRHS Chapter's Independence Limited and Mr. G Clayter was at the throttle between Belvue and Ft. Wayne, I was in the vestibule of the last car (observation) and while the ETT read speed max for passenger trains was 60, I clocked us at 51 seconds between MP's. Mentioned it to some of the engine crew enroute to the motel and they denyed any speeding. Who's going to tell the boss. But the thing that still impresses me was that the track was perfect. Looking up the length of the train, there was no motion between the cars. None. We could have been stopped, the cars had NO jouncing or motion at the diaphrams. That track could have been rated for 100+. Still carry a speed table but use GPS.

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:45 PM

An old Santa Fe story: The General Manager was in his business car behind Train #19, The Chief, on the New Mexico Division where he had been Superentdent for many years. The engineer was a man whom he had relied upon to make up time when a passenger train had been delayed. Upon arriving at Las Vegas, the crew change location, the GM was on the platform when the engineer walked toward the yard office to sign out. The GM said "Pete my car showed a speed of 65 between MP's 742 and 744 and the TT restriction is 55. Pete replied I sure didn't see you go around me. OK Pete, we arrived in Las Vegas On Time."

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, November 2, 2017 12:49 PM

I was on one of trains and got out my phone to check our speed.  I was about to flip when it occurred to me that the app was displaying km/hour, vs MPH...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy