Trains.com

Playing chicken with a train?

4986 views
64 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Playing chicken with a train?
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:12 AM

http://www.news3lv.com/content/news/story/Teens-game-of-chicken-causes-train-to-derail/Eh6nNq_ecU-eDn0GxLzz1Q.cspx 


       What's that saying?  The Lord must love dumb people.  He made so many of them?  Beyond the obvious of what's wrong with this picture, I have a railroad question. 

      If I'm reading this right, it seems that a train of empty auto racks came upon a pickup on the tracks playing chicken with the train.  According to the news article,   "the conductor slammed on the emergency brakes, causing the train to derail".  Really?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:27 AM

"The cargo was empty"?

I guess we just have to forgive them for they know not what they write.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, December 31, 2015 9:46 AM

In spite of how poorly the article was written (not only don't they know what, they don't know how!), the situation you're asking about is 100 percent plausible, Norris.

Although I suspect that this reporter doesn't know the difference between an engineer and a conductor (a common affliction these days), the conductor can usually be found in the cab of a train, across from the engineer, and he does have an emergency brake valve on his side of the cab. 

And just the fact that the brakes grab more quickly on some cars than on others is enough to cause strong enough slack action to lift portions of cars off the rail and deposit them not quite where they belong.

(If we have the facts right there, I can imagine the engineer being very upset with his conductor for taking matters into his own hands, if proper train handling left them with a better option.  But one hopes that that discussion would end right there in the cab.)

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 10:13 AM
Train brakes go into “Emergency” with great frequency.  Sometimes that “Emergency” application causes a train to derail.  The event that causes the train to go into “Emergency” has nothing to do with the actual cause of the derailment.   
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, December 31, 2015 11:48 AM

Running the slack-in in emergency is never a good thing. The weakest link will certainly go up while in compression.

The local idiots now are looking at a federal rap-sheet.

The "newsworker" probably thinks all operating employees are conductors.

Tens of thousands?

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 31, 2015 11:57 AM

Euclid
Train brakes go into “Emergency” with great frequency.  Sometimes that “Emergency” application causes a train to derail.  The event that causes the train to go into “Emergency” has nothing to do with the actual cause of the derailment.   

The shyster for the Defense has spoken!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:18 PM

I am not defending the guys in the truck.  Obviously they violated the grade crossing law.  If they got hit doing that, and the train derailed, I could see a charge for derailing the train.  But if the train derailed simply because it was put into an acceptable, routine phase of braking, I doubt that the charge will stick.  Any good lawyer will tell the jury that the train was defectively unsafe because a brake application piled it up.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:19 PM

And a good lawyer will explain that emergency braking is not a routine phase of braking.  Hence the term:

EMERGENCY.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:35 PM

zugmann

And a good lawyer will explain that emergency braking is not a routine phase of braking.  Hence the term:

EMERGENCY.

 

I just knew somebody would point that out.  I worried about the word, "routine."  Maybe a better way to say it is that the "Emergency" phase is a normal part of the brake system even though an actual emergency requiring the quick stopping is not normal.   

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:40 PM

Euclid
even though an actual emergency requiring the quick stopping is not normal.

Hence, not routine. Kind of hurts your argument a bit counselor.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 1:11 PM

Euclid
Any good lawyer will tell the jury that the train was defectively unsafe because a brake application piled it up.

Make that any shyster lawyer and we might agree with you. No reputable lawyer who has done his homework would make such a claim knowing it could easily be refuted by the railroad's attorneys.

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 1:23 PM

Cue the ECP argument.

Wait for it.....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 1:37 PM
Norm48327
 
Euclid
Any good lawyer will tell the jury that the train was defectively unsafe because a brake application piled it up.

 

Make that any shyster lawyer and we might agree with you. No reputable lawyer who has done his homework would make such a claim knowing it could easily be refuted by the railroad's attorneys.

 

My guess is that the charge of derailing the train was cooked up by the police.  The railroad lawyers would know better than to promote the fact that their brake systems can endanger the public and cause more damage than the emergency that they address. 
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, December 31, 2015 2:00 PM

But for the fact that the pickup was on the tracks the emergency brake would not have been applied. The railroad could sue these guys for reckless endangerment along with property damage not to mention trespassing.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 2:03 PM

Euclid
The railroad lawyers would know better than to promote the fact that their brake systems can endanger the public and cause more damage than the emergency that they address.

 

Only in your world, Bucky.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 2:20 PM

Ulrich

But for the fact that the pickup was on the tracks the emergency brake would not have been applied. The railroad could sue these guys for reckless endangerment along with property damage not to mention trespassing.

 

Oh yes absolutely true on all counts. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:09 PM

Makes me wonder if the two "gentlemen" now entwined in the court system were watching "Groundhog Day" and taking a cue from that.  Mailboxes, etc.

[Driving down the railroad tracks toward an approaching train]

 

Phil: I'm betting he's going to swerve first.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:28 PM

I'll tell 'ya boys, the "Singapore Solution" for vandals, i.e. flogging with a bamboo cane, is sounding better and better.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:39 PM

Again - in our house - right or wrong the saying was "hit them first and then apply the emergency.  We aren't going into emergency and then they get out of the way".

I would imagine it would be hard to prove at the investigation that there was this phantom car, individual, whatever....

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 5:17 PM

Back in the '90s up in New Jersey there was a rash of tresspasser incidents, people hit by trains, on Conrail's West Shore line.  Conrail put out the word in the local papers, if anyone was walking on the tracks the train crews were NOT going to put the trains into emergency stop, possibly causing any derailments which could be devastating in that densely populated area, to say nothing about any injuries that might happen to the train crews. 

They'd stop after the hit, not before.  I don't believe there were any incidents for a long, long time after the announcement.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 5:18 PM
Mookie

Again - in our house - right or wrong the saying was "hit them first and then apply the emergency.  We aren't going into emergency and then they get out of the way".

I would imagine it would be hard to prove at the investigation that there was this phantom car, individual, whatever....

 
I think that is the important point.  If you are far enough away for an emergency application to slow down enough to make much difference, there is still plenty of time for the vehicle to get out of the way.  If you are so close that a collision is almost certain, it is too late for an emergency application to make much difference.  It would be interesting to know exactly what went on in the case of this game of chicken. 
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 5:26 PM

Mookie
I would imagine it would be hard to prove at the investigation that there was this phantom car, individual, whatever....

Most engines have cameras on them now.  Pretty easy to prove.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 5:29 PM

Euclid
I think that is the important point. If you are far enough away for an emergency application to slow down enough to make much difference, there is still plenty of time for the vehicle to get out of the way. If you are so close that a collision is almost certain, it is too late for an emergency application to make much difference. It would be interesting to know exactly what went on in the case of this game of chicken.

 

 

Unfortunately for the people in the cab, the seconds leading up to such a decision don't normally allow for these philosophical decisions. 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:08 PM

zugmann
 
Euclid
I think that is the important point. If you are far enough away for an emergency application to slow down enough to make much difference, there is still plenty of time for the vehicle to get out of the way. If you are so close that a collision is almost certain, it is too late for an emergency application to make much difference. It would be interesting to know exactly what went on in the case of this game of chicken.

 

 

 

Unfortunately for the people in the cab, the seconds leading up to such a decision don't normally allow for these philosophical decisions. 

 

 

It is not philosophical at all.  It is pure common sense, and it should be thought through way before the seconds that call for decision and action. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:31 PM

Euclid
It is not philosophical at all. It is pure common sense, and it should be thought through way before the seconds that call for decision and action.

Ok.  Lay it out for us.  When should an engineer dump (or not dump) his train?   List some scenarios.   Shouldn't be hard.  After all, it's just common sense.  Hell, I want to make a checklist.

 

I eagerly await your reply.

And I'll ask: have you ever been in T&E or in a position of RR management? 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:39 PM

Euclid
It is not philosophical at all.  It is pure common sense, and it should be thought through way before the seconds that call for decision and action. 

Really?

Come back and talk to us when you've got a couple thousand hours in the seat...

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:41 PM

Euclid

 

 
zugmann
 
Euclid
I think that is the important point. If you are far enough away for an emergency application to slow down enough to make much difference, there is still plenty of time for the vehicle to get out of the way. If you are so close that a collision is almost certain, it is too late for an emergency application to make much difference. It would be interesting to know exactly what went on in the case of this game of chicken.

 

 

 

Unfortunately for the people in the cab, the seconds leading up to such a decision don't normally allow for these philosophical decisions. 

 

 

 

 

It is not philosophical at all.  It is pure common sense, and it should be thought through way before the seconds that call for decision and action. 

 

 Mindreading 101:  Practical applications of fantasy scenarios imagined by folks who have obviously never operated a train and appear to never have even read about operating a train either.  It's too late to put the genie back in the bottle.  It might be easier to just stop digging the hole deeper.Black Eye 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:43 PM

Murphy Siding
It might be easier to just stop digging the hole deeper.Black Eye

But I'm bored.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:46 PM

Mookie

Again - in our house - right or wrong the saying was "hit them first and then apply the emergency.  We aren't going into emergency and then they get out of the way".

I would imagine it would be hard to prove at the investigation that there was this phantom car, individual, whatever....

 

 I agree.  Everything I've ever read and the railroad people I've spoken with say that for a vehicle on the tracks, unless it's a tanker truck or something, the train is going to win.  Playing goosy, goosy, gander at every potential collison with a car or pickup doesn't seem like a reasonable operating procedure.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, December 31, 2015 6:48 PM

zugmann

 

 
Murphy Siding
It might be easier to just stop digging the hole deeper.Black Eye

 

But I'm bored.

 

 I was suggesting that to the fella with the shovel in his hand.Whistling
Although, it might be interesting to see just what the proper procedure would be for each of 10,000 different scenarios possible.  I hope someone does take notes.Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy