Trains.com

Car Heritage question.

1162 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, March 28, 2015 9:02 PM

Wow!  Thanks, Don!

Lots of history here!


Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, March 27, 2015 9:51 AM

WVCX 4112 before that.

Looks like originally MILW 62085, built 10/1975

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:25 PM

Is this car used to haul telephone poles?

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 389 posts
Posted by corwinda on Thursday, March 26, 2015 10:21 PM

It looks to me like the far end bulkhead HAS been raised just like the near one. There appears to be a color difference on the side of the bulkhead - the top corresponding to the extension is much rustier. I suspect that this car originally had a wood on steel frame bulkhead, and the wood was replaced with steel at the same time as the bulkhead was raised thus requiring the entire panel to be painted at once.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, March 26, 2015 8:06 PM

Shows how much I haven't seen yet...I don't have JOBX or NPGX in my files.  

I'm also reasonably sure that NPGX isn't the original reporting mark of this car.

Now, it appears that the car has had its bulkhead on this end raised in height, but not the one on the opposite end (or maybe it did, though they seem to have repainted the interior of that bulkhead and not the exterior of the new one!).  Yet the stakes seem to match the height of the bulkheads nearest them, and roughly match each other.  Am I being victimized by optical illusions?

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:38 PM

Car was previously NPGX 4112 according to it's UMLER record.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 404 posts
Car Heritage question.
Posted by DavidH66 on Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:58 PM

I believe this car has been repatched recently, I'm wonderring who the old owner is?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy