Trains.com

Trackside with Trains Vol. 251: "Mountain backdrops" is LIVE

1132 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: ___ _, ____
  • 180 posts
Trackside with Trains Vol. 251: "Mountain backdrops" is LIVE
Posted by D-Halv on Monday, January 19, 2015 11:07 AM
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Monday, January 26, 2015 12:15 PM

Went with Alex Mays.  Kirk's needed something brighter than Amtrak blue and gray; I had to look twice to spot the train.

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Sturgeon Bay, WI
  • 28 posts
Posted by saldana17 on Monday, January 26, 2015 9:33 PM
I also chose Alex Mayes photo because we are in "Snow Season" now and I like BNSF. Good multi power and not a dark photo.

Walkin' the Rails

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 31 posts
Posted by mike_ruby on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:46 PM

A selfish choice this time, Bryan Bechtold's reminds me of my first view of the Canadian Rockies after leaving Calgary on the Canadian many years ago.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, January 27, 2015 11:25 PM

     A question about one of the photos-Chris Paulhamus are you listening?  The Alaska Railroad shot shows a train pulling export coal from Anchorage over a big grade to Seward.  Isn't Anchorage Alaska's biggest port?  Is there no coal loading facility there?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Anchorage, AK
  • 45 posts
Posted by Lear35A on Wednesday, January 28, 2015 3:53 PM

I am listening (or, rather, reading)!  First, thanks to all who have voted for my photo this week...hoping we can make it across the finish line a little better than the last Trackside contest!

But to answer your question, Anchorage is in fact the largest port in Alaska, but there is not a coal facility located there.  I'm not sure why Seward was ultimately chosen or even when, but I do know that Anchorage is a rather shallow port and tends to ice up in the winter (in addition to dealing with crazy tides).  Seward (and Whittier) are deep(er) water ports and are typically ice-free year-round.

The Alaska Railroad is building a rail extension to Point Mackenzie, which is across the Knik Arm from Anchorage.  They are building a modern port over there which will have a bit deeper water with which to work (not sure how they'll deal with the ice situation though).  I'm not sure of the final plans, but if there is an expansion in coal production/export in Alaska, I have read that some of that coal may go to Point Mackenzie.  But I think the plans to expand coal have hit a snag, so who knows.  I do know that some in Seward are not fans of having a coal facility in their town because of the coal dust it produces.

I'm sure someone else has more insight into the port situation in Alaska, but the one thing I do know, the rail extension to Point Mackenzie will be waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay less photogenic than the line to Seward!

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:33 PM

     Thanks for the response.  I was born in Palmer and went to grade school in Chugiak.  I remember taking a field trip to the dock area in Anchorage.  That's what made me wonder why there would be no coal dock there.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy